JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN DIVORCE CASES DUE TO BROKEN MARRIAGE: AN ANALYSIS OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW

Purpose - This study aims to analyze the implementation of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2022 in divorce cases at the Yogyakarta Religious Court, especially in case Number 119/Pdt. G/2024/PA.YK using Contemporary Islamic Family Law. This regulation stipulates formal requirements for divorce, including the provision of a minimum of six months of separation from home for couples who apply for divorce on the grounds of continuous disagreement (broken marriage). This study examines the judge's reasoning in granting a divorce, even though these requirements have not been fully met.Method - Normative legal methods are used with a document study approach or literature research. This study focused on the decision of Yogyakarta Religious Court Number 119/Pdt. G/2024/PA.YK. The analysis focuses on court decisions with permanent legal force to understand the application of regulations in judicial practice by analyzing them using maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah theory and Judge Discretion theory.Findings - The results showed that even though the six-month separation requirement had not been met, the panel of judges still granted divorce because the dispute had not subsided (broken marriage), and there was no hope for reconciliation. This indicates flexibility in applying SEMA Number 1 Year 2022 following the actual conditions of the disputing couple.Research contribution/limitations - Theoretically, this study enriches the contemporary Islamic family law literature and provides insights into policies in Religious Courts. This study offers policy recommendations for applying SEMA No. 1 in 2022 to increase legal certainty in divorce cases. However, the limitation of this research is that its scope is limited to one particular case; therefore, further research with a broader scope is needed.Originality/value - The originality of this research lies in the empirical analysis of the implementation of SEMA No. 1 of 2022 in recent divorce cases, which has not been specifically studied. This study contributes to the development of contemporary Islamic legal theory and provides practical solutions for the world of justice and family law policies in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art8
Primary Topic
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN DIVORCE CASES DUE TO BROKEN MARRIAGE: AN ANALYSIS OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW

Indah Listyorini, Ana Ulfiana, Muhamamd Yasir Majeed
1 links
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
article

JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN DIVORCE CASES DUE TO BROKEN MARRIAGE: AN ANALYSIS OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW

Indah Listyorini, Ana Ulfiana, Muhamamd Yasir Majeed
article en

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to analyze the implementation of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2022 in divorce cases at the Yogyakarta Religious Court, especially in case Number 119/Pdt. G/2024/PA.YK using Contemporary Islamic Family Law. This regulation stipulates formal requirements for divorce, including the provision of a minimum of six months of separation from home for couples who apply for divorce on the grounds of continuous disagreement (broken marriage). This study examines the judge's reasoning in granting a divorce, even though these requirements have not been fully met.Method - Normative legal methods are used with a document study approach or literature research. This study focused on the decision of Yogyakarta Religious Court Number 119/Pdt. G/2024/PA.YK. The analysis focuses on court decisions with permanent legal force to understand the application of regulations in judicial practice by analyzing them using maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah theory and Judge Discretion theory.Findings - The results showed that even though the six-month separation requirement had not been met, the panel of judges still granted divorce because the dispute had not subsided (broken marriage), and there was no hope for reconciliation. This indicates flexibility in applying SEMA Number 1 Year 2022 following the actual conditions of the disputing couple.Research contribution/limitations - Theoretically, this study enriches the contemporary Islamic family law literature and provides insights into policies in Religious Courts. This study offers policy recommendations for applying SEMA No. 1 in 2022 to increase legal certainty in divorce cases. However, the limitation of this research is that its scope is limited to one particular case; therefore, further research with a broader scope is needed.Originality/value - The originality of this research lies in the empirical analysis of the implementation of SEMA No. 1 of 2022 in recent divorce cases, which has not been specifically studied. This study contributes to the development of contemporary Islamic legal theory and provides practical solutions for the world of justice and family law policies in Indonesia.

al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)Vol. 7(1)
Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta (ID), University of Wah (PK), Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.