Reading format preferences of working actors in a professional context

This study investigates actors’ preferred format (print or electronic) for their scripts when preparing for a performance project (screen, stage, voiceover). It builds on a body of research into reading format preferences of students in academic settings. Like academic reading, actors must internalize their text for the successful completion of their task. They must also memorize their lines and imbue them with characterization, movements, emotions, expressions, reactions, motivations, and vocal intonations. Data gathering was conducted through an online survey, and the authors used descriptive, comparative, and thematic analysis methods. Results were mapped to the Reading Event Analysis Model, a guide to predict readers’ format preferences depending on contexts. Results from 357 actors in 27 countries show they overwhelmingly prefer print format for various reasons. These reasons are similar to those of college students but carry unique nuances. Actors recognize memorization as key to most performance tasks, and mobility while learning as essential. They find the low-tech qualities of print most conducive to achieving their professional goals. Findings from this study of an alternative learning context broaden our understanding of the many types of reading and readers. Implications may be applied to pedagogical approaches of reading instruction for children and adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Adult and Continuing Education
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714251336723
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading format preferences of working actors in a professional context

Diane Mizrachi, Alicia Salaz, Gian Franco Tordi
Journal of Adult and Continuing Education
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Reading format preferences of working actors in a professional context

Diane Mizrachi, Alicia Salaz, Gian Franco Tordi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates actors’ preferred format (print or electronic) for their scripts when preparing for a performance project (screen, stage, voiceover). It builds on a body of research into reading format preferences of students in academic settings. Like academic reading, actors must internalize their text for the successful completion of their task. They must also memorize their lines and imbue them with characterization, movements, emotions, expressions, reactions, motivations, and vocal intonations. Data gathering was conducted through an online survey, and the authors used descriptive, comparative, and thematic analysis methods. Results were mapped to the Reading Event Analysis Model, a guide to predict readers’ format preferences depending on contexts. Results from 357 actors in 27 countries show they overwhelmingly prefer print format for various reasons. These reasons are similar to those of college students but carry unique nuances. Actors recognize memorization as key to most performance tasks, and mobility while learning as essential. They find the low-tech qualities of print most conducive to achieving their professional goals. Findings from this study of an alternative learning context broaden our understanding of the many types of reading and readers. Implications may be applied to pedagogical approaches of reading instruction for children and adults.

Journal of Adult and Continuing EducationVol. 32(1)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Oregon (US), Lyceum College (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.