Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Structural Dynamic Response Analysis: Theoretical and Numerical Verification

The classical step-by-step integration method is commonly used for solving structural dynamic responses, but its performance is highly sensitive to the choice of time step. A large time step can significantly reduce accuracy and stability, while a very small time step greatly diminishes computational efficiency. Data-driven modeling and analysis methods are particularly favored for their potential to replace traditional structural analysis methods. However, traditional data-driven machine learning approaches require substantial amounts of training data to predict structural dynamic responses. Moreover, these methods often function as black boxes, lacking physical interpretability, and acquiring the necessary data can be challenging in practice. To address these limitations, this paper employs a physics-informed neural network (PINN) method for structural dynamic response analysis. The PINN approach incorporates the governing equations of structural dynamics into the neural network’s loss function as physical constraints, endowing the model with physical interpretability. The feasibility and effectiveness of this method are demonstrated through case studies on structural dynamic responses under different excitation scenarios. Numerical results show that the PINN method can accurately analyze structural dynamic responses without relying on system response data, a key advantage over traditional data-driven models. Moreover, unlike the classical step-by-step integration method, the PINN approach operates as a spatial domain optimization process and is independent of time step. Given the critical role of hyperparameters in the performance of the PINN model, this paper systematically investigates the influence of various hyperparameter settings on accuracy and efficiency, uncovering patterns of their impact on structural response analysis. Replication code for this paper will be available on GitHub:https://github.com/duke-iem/AIStructDynSolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455426502949
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Structural Dynamic Response Analysis: Theoretical and Numerical Verification

Huan Luo, Ruizhi Wen, Ke Du, Zifa Wang et al.
8 citations
International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
7.63
article

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Structural Dynamic Response Analysis: Theoretical and Numerical Verification

Huan Luo, Ruizhi Wen, Ke Du, Zifa Wang, Qi Jing
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The classical step-by-step integration method is commonly used for solving structural dynamic responses, but its performance is highly sensitive to the choice of time step. A large time step can significantly reduce accuracy and stability, while a very small time step greatly diminishes computational efficiency. Data-driven modeling and analysis methods are particularly favored for their potential to replace traditional structural analysis methods. However, traditional data-driven machine learning approaches require substantial amounts of training data to predict structural dynamic responses. Moreover, these methods often function as black boxes, lacking physical interpretability, and acquiring the necessary data can be challenging in practice. To address these limitations, this paper employs a physics-informed neural network (PINN) method for structural dynamic response analysis. The PINN approach incorporates the governing equations of structural dynamics into the neural network’s loss function as physical constraints, endowing the model with physical interpretability. The feasibility and effectiveness of this method are demonstrated through case studies on structural dynamic responses under different excitation scenarios. Numerical results show that the PINN method can accurately analyze structural dynamic responses without relying on system response data, a key advantage over traditional data-driven models. Moreover, unlike the classical step-by-step integration method, the PINN approach operates as a spatial domain optimization process and is independent of time step. Given the critical role of hyperparameters in the performance of the PINN model, this paper systematically investigates the influence of various hyperparameter settings on accuracy and efficiency, uncovering patterns of their impact on structural response analysis. Replication code for this paper will be available on GitHub:https://github.com/duke-iem/AIStructDynSolve.

International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
China Three Gorges University (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
7.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.