Testing Strategies for OpenFOAM Projects

While testing is increasingly recognized as essential in scientific software development, it is not yet standard practice within the OpenFOAM community for developing new solvers and features. This gap stems partly from the challenges of integrating testing into typical OpenFOAM workflows and limited guidance on implementing effective tests. Writing tests for complex software like OpenFOAM based projects presents unique obstacles, including difficulty in configuring tests for various cases. This paper addresses these issues by discussing established test types in the context of OpenFOAM, identifying common challenges in developing tests for this platform, and suggesting best practices to enhance the testability of code based on OpenFOAM. Detailed guidance is provided for integrating the Catch2 unit test framework, alongside two new tools: the foamUT framework and the OpenFOAM Benchmark Runner (OBR), which facilitate unit and integration testing. To illustrate these tools in practice, we present three case studies. The first demonstrates the direct integration of Catch2 in the WENOExt project, showcasing test case creation and its synergy with OpenFOAM projects. The second introduces the foamUT framework, which simplifies Catch2 integration for OpenFOAM projects. Finally, the OBR framework is used for benchmarking and integration tests in the OpenFOAM Ginkgo layer. Additionally, we discuss the current state of testing in OpenFOAM and emphasize the need for more comprehensive testing practices within this community, particularly with libraries such as Catch2. Overall, this paper serves as a practical introduction to unit and integration testing for OpenFOAM developers and introduces new tools that lower the barrier to entry, improve test suite robustness, and simplify unit test integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OpenFOAM® Journal
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v5.134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing Strategies for OpenFOAM Projects

Gregor Olenik, Andreas Kronenburg, Hartwig Anzt, Holger Marschall et al.
1 citations
OpenFOAM® Journal
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
0.95
article

Testing Strategies for OpenFOAM Projects

Gregor Olenik, Andreas Kronenburg, Hartwig Anzt, Holger Marschall, Jan Wilhelm Gärtner, Mohammed Elwardi Fadeli, Lukas Petermann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While testing is increasingly recognized as essential in scientific software development, it is not yet standard practice within the OpenFOAM community for developing new solvers and features. This gap stems partly from the challenges of integrating testing into typical OpenFOAM workflows and limited guidance on implementing effective tests. Writing tests for complex software like OpenFOAM based projects presents unique obstacles, including difficulty in configuring tests for various cases. This paper addresses these issues by discussing established test types in the context of OpenFOAM, identifying common challenges in developing tests for this platform, and suggesting best practices to enhance the testability of code based on OpenFOAM. Detailed guidance is provided for integrating the Catch2 unit test framework, alongside two new tools: the foamUT framework and the OpenFOAM Benchmark Runner (OBR), which facilitate unit and integration testing. To illustrate these tools in practice, we present three case studies. The first demonstrates the direct integration of Catch2 in the WENOExt project, showcasing test case creation and its synergy with OpenFOAM projects. The second introduces the foamUT framework, which simplifies Catch2 integration for OpenFOAM projects. Finally, the OBR framework is used for benchmarking and integration tests in the OpenFOAM Ginkgo layer. Additionally, we discuss the current state of testing in OpenFOAM and emphasize the need for more comprehensive testing practices within this community, particularly with libraries such as Catch2. Overall, this paper serves as a practical introduction to unit and integration testing for OpenFOAM developers and introduces new tools that lower the barrier to entry, improve test suite robustness, and simplify unit test integration.

OpenFOAM® JournalVol. 5
University of Stuttgart (DE), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Computing Center (RU), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.