Comparison of Prostaglandin E2 And Misoprostol for Induction in Second Trimester Miscarriage in Patients Presented in Independent University Hospital Faisalabad

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Misoprostol and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) for induction in second-trimester miscarriage, considering demographic and clinical factors. Study Settings: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Independent Medical University, Faisalabad, over six months. Duration of Study: The study was conducted after ethical approval and spanned six months. Data Collection: A total of 130 women aged 18-40 years with a gestational age of 13-28 weeks requiring second-trimester pregnancy termination due to intrauterine fetal demise (IUD) or missed miscarriage were included. Participants were randomized into two groups: Misoprostol group (n = 65): Received 50 mcg Misoprostol orally every 4 hours, up to five doses if needed. PGE-2 group (n = 65): Received 0.5 mg PGE-2 intra-vaginally, up to three doses if needed. Efficacy was defined as complete abortion (expulsion of all products of conception), confirmed via ultrasound 12 hours post-treatment. Results: The mean age was 29.32 ± 6.78 years (Misoprostol) vs. 27.25 ± 6.53 years (PGE-2). The majority had a gestational age of >18-28 weeks (78.5% Misoprostol, 55.4% PGE-2). Parity was 0-3 in 81.5% (Misoprostol) and 58.5% (PGE-2). The induction-to-delivery time was similar (12.11 ± 3.12 hours for Misoprostol vs. 12.29 ± 2.83 hours for PGE-2). However, the Misoprostol group required more doses (3.23 ± 1.44 vs. 1.91 ± 0.82, p < 0.05). Complete abortion was achieved in 95.4% of Misoprostol cases vs. 76.9% of PGE-2 cases. Incomplete abortion occurred in 4.6% of Misoprostol patients vs. 23.1% of PGE-2 patients. Misoprostol showed a significantly higher success rate in patients >30 years (p = 0.005) and gestational age >18-28 weeks (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Misoprostol is more effective than PGE-2 for second-trimester miscarriage induction, demonstrating higher efficacy, shorter induction-to-delivery times, and a favorable safety profile. Given its cost-effectiveness and ease of administration, Misoprostol should be considered the preferred agent for second-trimester pregnancy termination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.974
Primary Topic
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Prostaglandin E2 And Misoprostol for Induction in Second Trimester Miscarriage in Patients Presented in Independent University Hospital Faisalabad

Zara Khan
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
article

Comparison of Prostaglandin E2 And Misoprostol for Induction in Second Trimester Miscarriage in Patients Presented in Independent University Hospital Faisalabad

Zara Khan
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Misoprostol and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) for induction in second-trimester miscarriage, considering demographic and clinical factors. Study Settings: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Independent Medical University, Faisalabad, over six months. Duration of Study: The study was conducted after ethical approval and spanned six months. Data Collection: A total of 130 women aged 18-40 years with a gestational age of 13-28 weeks requiring second-trimester pregnancy termination due to intrauterine fetal demise (IUD) or missed miscarriage were included. Participants were randomized into two groups: Misoprostol group (n = 65): Received 50 mcg Misoprostol orally every 4 hours, up to five doses if needed. PGE-2 group (n = 65): Received 0.5 mg PGE-2 intra-vaginally, up to three doses if needed. Efficacy was defined as complete abortion (expulsion of all products of conception), confirmed via ultrasound 12 hours post-treatment. Results: The mean age was 29.32 ± 6.78 years (Misoprostol) vs. 27.25 ± 6.53 years (PGE-2). The majority had a gestational age of >18-28 weeks (78.5% Misoprostol, 55.4% PGE-2). Parity was 0-3 in 81.5% (Misoprostol) and 58.5% (PGE-2). The induction-to-delivery time was similar (12.11 ± 3.12 hours for Misoprostol vs. 12.29 ± 2.83 hours for PGE-2). However, the Misoprostol group required more doses (3.23 ± 1.44 vs. 1.91 ± 0.82, p < 0.05). Complete abortion was achieved in 95.4% of Misoprostol cases vs. 76.9% of PGE-2 cases. Incomplete abortion occurred in 4.6% of Misoprostol patients vs. 23.1% of PGE-2 patients. Misoprostol showed a significantly higher success rate in patients >30 years (p = 0.005) and gestational age >18-28 weeks (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Misoprostol is more effective than PGE-2 for second-trimester miscarriage induction, demonstrating higher efficacy, shorter induction-to-delivery times, and a favorable safety profile. Given its cost-effectiveness and ease of administration, Misoprostol should be considered the preferred agent for second-trimester pregnancy termination.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(4)
Punjab Medical College (PK), University of Faisalabad (PK), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.