Orthorexia Nervosa, Weight Bias, and Adverse Childhood Events Among Nutrition Students

Nutrition student education focuses on teaching future nutrition professionals how to assist clients in health promotion, but many students and professionals in the field display disordered eating tendencies and weight bias. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are a risk factor for the development of eating disorders but have not been studied in this population. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and associations between orthorexia (ON), weight bias, and ACEs among nutrition students, and their perceptions of the impact of nutrition curriculum on their diet and body. A mixed methods survey consisting of sociodemographic questions, ON tendencies, weight bias, ACEs, and perceptions of curriculum content was distributed to university nutrition programs in 12 mid-southeast states with the U.S. Pearson’s Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Person’s correlation test, and independent samples t-tests assessing the relationship between variables. Open-ended responses were analyzed using inductive analysis. Of 164 respondents, the majority were female (92.1%) and white (82.0%). The mean ORTO-R (measure of orthorexia tendencies) was 14.57, 49.4% had a dysfunctional family (exposure to at least one family dysfunction), and participants demonstrated moderate levels of implicit weight prejudice, M=0.42, SD=0.38, denoting a significant level of bias (P<0.001). Undergraduates reported significantly greater ON symptoms than graduate students (P<0.001). No significant associations between ON, weight bias, and ACEs were present. From the open-ended responses, negative curriculum impacts were perceived guilt and shame, commonly from self-assessment activities. Positive curriculum impacts were most often an improved relationship with food and learning about body inclusivity. Nutrition students are future nutrition professionals who will interact with clients for health promotion. Policies and procedures to support nutrition students with disordered eating are warranted, along with adapting current curriculum content to decrease stigma and encourage food and body inclusivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Behavior Research
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1281
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthorexia Nervosa, Weight Bias, and Adverse Childhood Events Among Nutrition Students

Manan Roy, A. Earl Walker, Katie Wolsiefer, Danielle Nunnery et al.
Health Behavior Research
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Orthorexia Nervosa, Weight Bias, and Adverse Childhood Events Among Nutrition Students

Manan Roy, A. Earl Walker, Katie Wolsiefer, Danielle Nunnery, Alisha Farris, Krista Clarke
article en

Abstract

Nutrition student education focuses on teaching future nutrition professionals how to assist clients in health promotion, but many students and professionals in the field display disordered eating tendencies and weight bias. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are a risk factor for the development of eating disorders but have not been studied in this population. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and associations between orthorexia (ON), weight bias, and ACEs among nutrition students, and their perceptions of the impact of nutrition curriculum on their diet and body. A mixed methods survey consisting of sociodemographic questions, ON tendencies, weight bias, ACEs, and perceptions of curriculum content was distributed to university nutrition programs in 12 mid-southeast states with the U.S. Pearson’s Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Person’s correlation test, and independent samples t-tests assessing the relationship between variables. Open-ended responses were analyzed using inductive analysis. Of 164 respondents, the majority were female (92.1%) and white (82.0%). The mean ORTO-R (measure of orthorexia tendencies) was 14.57, 49.4% had a dysfunctional family (exposure to at least one family dysfunction), and participants demonstrated moderate levels of implicit weight prejudice, M=0.42, SD=0.38, denoting a significant level of bias (P<0.001). Undergraduates reported significantly greater ON symptoms than graduate students (P<0.001). No significant associations between ON, weight bias, and ACEs were present. From the open-ended responses, negative curriculum impacts were perceived guilt and shame, commonly from self-assessment activities. Positive curriculum impacts were most often an improved relationship with food and learning about body inclusivity. Nutrition students are future nutrition professionals who will interact with clients for health promotion. Policies and procedures to support nutrition students with disordered eating are warranted, along with adapting current curriculum content to decrease stigma and encourage food and body inclusivity.

Health Behavior ResearchVol. 8(2)
Appalachian State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.