Direct comparison of the structural dynamics between spontaneous and ligand‐induced folding of staphylococcal nuclease

Despite numerous studies focusing on the folding mechanism of globular proteins as well as ligand-induced folding of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), a unified framework for understanding both types of folding mechanisms has remained elusive. To explore the similarities and differences in the structural dynamics of spontaneous versus ligand-dependent folding, we investigated the folding dynamics of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) in the presence and absence of the substrate analog adenosine 3',5'-diphosphate (prAp). We employed equilibrium and kinetic measurements, using fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy, to study the folding of SNase coupled with the binding of prAp as a function of ligand and urea concentrations, including conditions favoring either conformational selection (CS; folding before binding) or induced fit (IF; binding before folding) scenarios. Our findings revealed that during ligand-induced folding under IF conditions, the N-terminal β-barrel domain is formed first, followed by the α-helical domain. In contrast, under CS conditions, the α-helical domain forms before the β-barrel domain. Additionally, the dynamics of ligand-induced folding mirrors the sequence of events encountered along the minor of the two parallel pathways governing the spontaneous folding process. Therefore, some of the apparent mechanistic differences between spontaneous versus ligand-induced folding can be attributed to the fact that interactions with a nucleotide ligand result in a shift in flux from the major to the minor folding pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Protein Science
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70135
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct comparison of the structural dynamics between spontaneous and ligand‐induced folding of staphylococcal nuclease

Heinrich Röder, Kosuke Maki, Issei Suzuki, Takuya Mizukami et al.
1 citations
Protein Science
Protein Structure and Dynamics
0.81
article

Direct comparison of the structural dynamics between spontaneous and ligand‐induced folding of staphylococcal nuclease

Heinrich Röder, Kosuke Maki, Issei Suzuki, Takuya Mizukami, Kunio Miki, Yujiro MORI, Shingo Fukazawa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite numerous studies focusing on the folding mechanism of globular proteins as well as ligand-induced folding of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), a unified framework for understanding both types of folding mechanisms has remained elusive. To explore the similarities and differences in the structural dynamics of spontaneous versus ligand-dependent folding, we investigated the folding dynamics of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) in the presence and absence of the substrate analog adenosine 3',5'-diphosphate (prAp). We employed equilibrium and kinetic measurements, using fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy, to study the folding of SNase coupled with the binding of prAp as a function of ligand and urea concentrations, including conditions favoring either conformational selection (CS; folding before binding) or induced fit (IF; binding before folding) scenarios. Our findings revealed that during ligand-induced folding under IF conditions, the N-terminal β-barrel domain is formed first, followed by the α-helical domain. In contrast, under CS conditions, the α-helical domain forms before the β-barrel domain. Additionally, the dynamics of ligand-induced folding mirrors the sequence of events encountered along the minor of the two parallel pathways governing the spontaneous folding process. Therefore, some of the apparent mechanistic differences between spontaneous versus ligand-induced folding can be attributed to the fact that interactions with a nucleotide ligand result in a shift in flux from the major to the minor folding pathway.

Protein ScienceVol. 34(5)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), Nagoya University (JP)
National Institutes of Health, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.