Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy

Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa. • The wildlife economy offers potential for inclusive socio-economic development and biodiversity conservation in rural lands. • Barriers for new market entrants include lack of infrastructure, game stocks, skills and appropriate business models. • Mixed livestock and wildlife farms are more suitable for new market entrants, enabling diverse investment and revenues. • Conservancies can create economies of scale and facilitate mentorship between established and emerging ranchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy

Alta De Vos, Matthew F. Child, Siviwe Shwababa, Hayley S. Clements et al.
Land Use Policy
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy

Alta De Vos, Matthew F. Child, Siviwe Shwababa, Hayley S. Clements, Naledi Mneno
article en

Abstract

Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa. • The wildlife economy offers potential for inclusive socio-economic development and biodiversity conservation in rural lands. • Barriers for new market entrants include lack of infrastructure, game stocks, skills and appropriate business models. • Mixed livestock and wildlife farms are more suitable for new market entrants, enabling diverse investment and revenues. • Conservancies can create economies of scale and facilitate mentorship between established and emerging ranchers.

Land Use PolicyVol. 154
Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (ZA), University of Helsinki (FI), Rhodes University (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA), Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ZA), National Biodiversity Institute (CR), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Agence Française de Développement
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.