Feasibility and advantages of markerless positioning guided by SGRT in non-surface tumor radiotherapy: focus on esophageal cancer

Our institute uses tattoos and skin markers in radiotherapy positioning, but permanent tattoos or loss of skin markers may negatively affect treatment. To evaluate markerless positioning in non-surface tumor applications, we use esophageal cancer as an entry point. We examined 52 esophageal cancer patients' treatment records retrospectively. A total of 26 patients were positioned with traditional tattoos, skin markers, and laser systems (group A). The remaining 26 patients used surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) only for markerless positioning (group B). Before treatment, all patients had cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, and six degrees of freedom (6DOF) shifts were recorded. The absolute setup errors for the CBCT were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, group B's positioning time and total treatment time were recorded to assess the positioning efficiency. 627 and 637 treatment fractions of groups A and B were compared and analyzed, respectively. The results demonstrated that group B's median shift magnitude was superior to group A's in the lateral (0.11 cm vs 0.18 cm, p < 0.001), longitudinal (0.14 cm vs 0.25 cm, p < 0.001), pitch (0.60 deg vs 1.30 deg, p < 0.001), and roll (0.50 deg vs 0.8 deg, p < 0.001) directions. In addition, the mean (median) positioning time in group B was 38.45 (35) seconds, and the mean (median) total treatment time was 486.42 (480) seconds. Markerless positioning using SGRT for esophageal cancer is accurate and efficient, providing a safe alternative for patients avoiding tattoos or skin markers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101552
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and advantages of markerless positioning guided by SGRT in non-surface tumor radiotherapy: focus on esophageal cancer

Feng Chi, Xiaobo Jiang, Xiuying Mai, Yilin Wang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
article

Feasibility and advantages of markerless positioning guided by SGRT in non-surface tumor radiotherapy: focus on esophageal cancer

Feng Chi, Xiaobo Jiang, Xiuying Mai, Yilin Wang, Tong Wang, Fanghua Li, Wenshu Zhou, Yu Luo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our institute uses tattoos and skin markers in radiotherapy positioning, but permanent tattoos or loss of skin markers may negatively affect treatment. To evaluate markerless positioning in non-surface tumor applications, we use esophageal cancer as an entry point. We examined 52 esophageal cancer patients' treatment records retrospectively. A total of 26 patients were positioned with traditional tattoos, skin markers, and laser systems (group A). The remaining 26 patients used surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) only for markerless positioning (group B). Before treatment, all patients had cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, and six degrees of freedom (6DOF) shifts were recorded. The absolute setup errors for the CBCT were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, group B's positioning time and total treatment time were recorded to assess the positioning efficiency. 627 and 637 treatment fractions of groups A and B were compared and analyzed, respectively. The results demonstrated that group B's median shift magnitude was superior to group A's in the lateral (0.11 cm vs 0.18 cm, p < 0.001), longitudinal (0.14 cm vs 0.25 cm, p < 0.001), pitch (0.60 deg vs 1.30 deg, p < 0.001), and roll (0.50 deg vs 0.8 deg, p < 0.001) directions. In addition, the mean (median) positioning time in group B was 38.45 (35) seconds, and the mean (median) total treatment time was 486.42 (480) seconds. Markerless positioning using SGRT for esophageal cancer is accurate and efficient, providing a safe alternative for patients avoiding tattoos or skin markers.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 18(2)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.