Indentation of axisymmetric rigid punch: Model implementation by a Python Algorithm

We present a computationally efficient Python algorithm based on the Boundary Element Method (BEM) for frictionless linear elastic axisymmetric contact of coated solids. The algorithm solves indentation problems using conical, spherical, and cylindrical flat indenters, with results also reported for flat punch indentation on a soft-coated substrate. To validate BEM, we implement Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations, analyzing soft layers with Poisson ratios of 0.25, 0.4, and 0.49, aspect ratios from 0.25 to 10, and modulus mismatches of 10 and 100. BEM and FEM show good agreement for compressible soft layers but diverge as incompressibility increases. For Poisson’s ratio of 0.4999, BEM fails due to confinement effects. We verify FEM results using the Poker-chip test, confirming accuracy in highly confined, nearly incompressible cases. For compressible soft layer and large aspect ratios, we found good agreement between BEM and analytical result of Poker-chip test applicable in that regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106259
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indentation of axisymmetric rigid punch: Model implementation by a Python Algorithm

Matteo Ciccotti, Étienne Barthel, Krupal Patel
2 citations
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
1.73
article

Indentation of axisymmetric rigid punch: Model implementation by a Python Algorithm

Matteo Ciccotti, Étienne Barthel, Krupal Patel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We present a computationally efficient Python algorithm based on the Boundary Element Method (BEM) for frictionless linear elastic axisymmetric contact of coated solids. The algorithm solves indentation problems using conical, spherical, and cylindrical flat indenters, with results also reported for flat punch indentation on a soft-coated substrate. To validate BEM, we implement Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations, analyzing soft layers with Poisson ratios of 0.25, 0.4, and 0.49, aspect ratios from 0.25 to 10, and modulus mismatches of 10 and 100. BEM and FEM show good agreement for compressible soft layers but diverge as incompressibility increases. For Poisson’s ratio of 0.4999, BEM fails due to confinement effects. We verify FEM results using the Poker-chip test, confirming accuracy in highly confined, nearly incompressible cases. For compressible soft layer and large aspect ratios, we found good agreement between BEM and analytical result of Poker-chip test applicable in that regime.

Engineering Analysis with Boundary ElementsVol. 177
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), University of Oxford (GB), ESPCI Paris (FR)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.