Advancing regulatory dialogue: In silico models for improved vaccine biomanufacturing - an expert meeting report

On March 30, 2022, Inno4Vac, a public-private partnership funded by the IMI2/EU/EFPIA Joint Undertaking (IMI2 JU), organised a hybrid workshop, titled "Regulatory Dialogue for Road Maps of Implementation of New Tools in Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Dossiers." This event brought together modellers, regulatory experts, and academic and industry professionals specialising in vaccine process and product development. The sessions discussed key parameters and requirements for model development and verification relevant to vaccine biomanufacturing and shelf life. The stability model was highlighted as having the most significant impact on the common technical document (CTD) due to its potential to streamline data requirements. Regulators are open to considering reliable reduced stability data packages (3-12 months) instead of the standard 36 months, potentially expediting product availability. Appropriate study design reduces uncertainty and therefore the risk of making poor decisions. Upstream models are further from the final product, and their role in the control strategy of the product will define their level of risk and, therefore, requirements for validation and inclusion of information in the file. Regulators may consider downstream models high risk as these can be associated with the monitoring and/or control of critical quality attributes and/or be involved in the release of a product. However, requirements for validation and/or dossier content should always be linked to the intended use of the model and its overall role in the control strategy as per the new EMA Quality Innovation Group Considerations regarding Pharmaceutical Process Models. The success of these models hinges on manufacturers providing enough quality data to prove their accuracy in representing real-world processes. Proactive engagement with regulators, supported by detailed evidence, can foster regulator understanding of new models and potentially lead to new guidelines and pathways for model acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127170
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing regulatory dialogue: In silico models for improved vaccine biomanufacturing - an expert meeting report

Antonio Gaetano Cardillo, Wim Van Molle, Mónica Vélez, Krist V. Gernaey et al.
1 citations
Vaccine
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
0.81
article

Advancing regulatory dialogue: In silico models for improved vaccine biomanufacturing - an expert meeting report

Antonio Gaetano Cardillo, Wim Van Molle, Mónica Vélez, Krist V. Gernaey, Koen Brusselmans, Irina Meln, Didier Clénet, Pierre Lebrun, Volker Öppling, Éric Calvosa, John Bagterp Jørgensen, Daniel G. Bracewell, Mats Welin, Julius Pollinger, Eric von Lieres, Marcel H. N. Hoefnagel, Bernt Nilsson, Michelle Rubbrecht, Johannes Schmölder, Andrea Rayat, Timothy Schofield, Greger Abrahamsen, Laurent Natalis, Dean Smith, Daniel Reem, Stefanie Timmins, Caroline Forestieri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

On March 30, 2022, Inno4Vac, a public-private partnership funded by the IMI2/EU/EFPIA Joint Undertaking (IMI2 JU), organised a hybrid workshop, titled "Regulatory Dialogue for Road Maps of Implementation of New Tools in Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Dossiers." This event brought together modellers, regulatory experts, and academic and industry professionals specialising in vaccine process and product development. The sessions discussed key parameters and requirements for model development and verification relevant to vaccine biomanufacturing and shelf life. The stability model was highlighted as having the most significant impact on the common technical document (CTD) due to its potential to streamline data requirements. Regulators are open to considering reliable reduced stability data packages (3-12 months) instead of the standard 36 months, potentially expediting product availability. Appropriate study design reduces uncertainty and therefore the risk of making poor decisions. Upstream models are further from the final product, and their role in the control strategy of the product will define their level of risk and, therefore, requirements for validation and inclusion of information in the file. Regulators may consider downstream models high risk as these can be associated with the monitoring and/or control of critical quality attributes and/or be involved in the release of a product. However, requirements for validation and/or dossier content should always be linked to the intended use of the model and its overall role in the control strategy as per the new EMA Quality Innovation Group Considerations regarding Pharmaceutical Process Models. The success of these models hinges on manufacturers providing enough quality data to prove their accuracy in representing real-world processes. Proactive engagement with regulators, supported by detailed evidence, can foster regulator understanding of new models and potentially lead to new guidelines and pathways for model acceptance.

VaccineVol. 56
Health Canada (CA), Medical Products Agency (SE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Lund University (SE), Direktoratet for medisinske produkter (NO), Sanofi (France) (FR), GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) (BE), GlaxoSmithKline (India) (IN), GlaxoSmithKline (Italy) (IT), Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE), Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative (DE), Sciensano (Belgium) (BE), Medicines Evaluation Board (NL), Institute of Applied Economics and Health Research ApS (DK), Senseonics (United States) (US), University College London (GB), Paul Ehrlich Institut (DE), Technical University of Denmark (DK), KU Leuven (BE), FH Aachen (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.