Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model‐Based Approach

Tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) is approved for the treatment of multiple cancers. We used a model-based approach to propose three alternative dosing regimens, 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W, with the aims of providing flexible treatment regimens compatible with background chemotherapy and/or reducing infusion visits. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate pharmacokinetic exposure of the alternative regimens. Regulatory guidance on alternative dosing was used to define pharmacokinetics-based criteria. Alternative doses were selected by simulation, exposure matching, and comparison to the reference regimen of 200 mg Q3W. Deviations from pharmacokinetics-based criteria were bridged using appropriate safety and efficacy references and exposure-response analyses. All three alternative dosing regimens produced comparable exposures versus 200 mg Q3W. Although simulated peak serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) at 300 mg Q4W and 400 mg Q6W was higher versus 200 mg Q3W, this was below the C<sub>max</sub> of the 5 mg/kg Q3W safety reference. And while the trough serum concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) for 400 mg Q6W was slightly lower versus 200 mg Q3W, it was 10.7% higher than the 2 mg/kg efficacy reference C<sub>trough</sub>, and therefore, within the concentration range in which a flat exposure-efficacy relationship of tislelizumab has been established. Tislelizumab regimens of 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W are expected to result in similar safety and efficacy as 200 mg Q3W.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70223
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model‐Based Approach

Ahsan Rizwan, Ya Wan, Patrick Schnell, Hugh Giovinazzo et al.
1 citations
Clinical and Translational Science
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
1.05
article

Alternative Dosing Regimens of Tislelizumab Using a Pharmacometrics Model‐Based Approach

Ahsan Rizwan, Ya Wan, Patrick Schnell, Hugh Giovinazzo, Yu Tian, Srikumar Sahasranaman, Ramil Abdrashitov, William D. Hanley, Nageshwar Budha, Kun Wang, Jun Wang, Fengyan Xu, Yuying Gao, Marcia Campbell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) is approved for the treatment of multiple cancers. We used a model-based approach to propose three alternative dosing regimens, 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W, with the aims of providing flexible treatment regimens compatible with background chemotherapy and/or reducing infusion visits. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate pharmacokinetic exposure of the alternative regimens. Regulatory guidance on alternative dosing was used to define pharmacokinetics-based criteria. Alternative doses were selected by simulation, exposure matching, and comparison to the reference regimen of 200 mg Q3W. Deviations from pharmacokinetics-based criteria were bridged using appropriate safety and efficacy references and exposure-response analyses. All three alternative dosing regimens produced comparable exposures versus 200 mg Q3W. Although simulated peak serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) at 300 mg Q4W and 400 mg Q6W was higher versus 200 mg Q3W, this was below the C<sub>max</sub> of the 5 mg/kg Q3W safety reference. And while the trough serum concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) for 400 mg Q6W was slightly lower versus 200 mg Q3W, it was 10.7% higher than the 2 mg/kg efficacy reference C<sub>trough</sub>, and therefore, within the concentration range in which a flat exposure-efficacy relationship of tislelizumab has been established. Tislelizumab regimens of 150 mg Q2W, 300 mg Q4W, and 400 mg Q6W are expected to result in similar safety and efficacy as 200 mg Q3W.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 18(5)
BeiGene (China) (CN)
BeiGene
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.