Enhancing YOLOv8 for Vehicle Detection in Intelligent Traffic Management

Object detection has witnessed significant advancements with the introduction of deep learning models. In this study, we evaluated YOLOv8 model on the BDD100K dataset over 25 epochs, focusing on its progression in precision, recall, mean Average Precision (mAP), and loss metrics. The YOLOv8 model was trained and evaluated on the BDD100K dataset. Data preprocessing was done by resizing images and applying augmentation techniques like scaling, flipping, and cropping to enhance generalization. The model utilized an anchor-free detection head and an optimized backbone network for improved performance. Training was conducted over 25 epochs using the stochastic gradient descent optimizer, with non-maximum suppression and confidence thresholding applied during post-processing to refine detections. Performance was assessed using precision, recall, mAP, and loss metrics. Early epochs were marked by high classification and box losses, which reduced significantly by epoch 5. Precision and recall improved consistently, with precision increasing from 0.81 to 0.74 and recall stabilizing around 0.72–0.78. Middle epochs (6–20) showed stabilization in losses, with box loss reducing to 0.7–0.8 and classification loss to 0.4–0.5. Performance metrics peaked during this phase, achieving a precision of 0.90, recall of 0.84, and mAP@50 and mAP@50-95 values of 0.90 and 0.74, respectively. During the final epochs (21–25), the model achieved optimal stability, with box loss around 0.69 and classification loss at 0.37. Precision remained at 0.90, recall at 0.85, and mAP metrics stabilized at 0.91 and 0.74. A comparative analysis underscored YOLOv8’s superiority over YOLOv5, achieving higher F1-score (0.87 vs. 0.67), mAP@50 (0.91 vs. 0.682), and mAP@50-95 (0.74 vs. 0.449). YOLOv8’s architectural advancements like anchor-free detection head and optimized backbone improved object detection. YOLOv8’s balance of precision and recall, supported by strong post-processing, affirms its robustness for real-world applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63278/1423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing YOLOv8 for Vehicle Detection in Intelligent Traffic Management

Jian Cheng, Abe Degale Desta
1 citations
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
1.14
article

Enhancing YOLOv8 for Vehicle Detection in Intelligent Traffic Management

Jian Cheng, Abe Degale Desta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Object detection has witnessed significant advancements with the introduction of deep learning models. In this study, we evaluated YOLOv8 model on the BDD100K dataset over 25 epochs, focusing on its progression in precision, recall, mean Average Precision (mAP), and loss metrics. The YOLOv8 model was trained and evaluated on the BDD100K dataset. Data preprocessing was done by resizing images and applying augmentation techniques like scaling, flipping, and cropping to enhance generalization. The model utilized an anchor-free detection head and an optimized backbone network for improved performance. Training was conducted over 25 epochs using the stochastic gradient descent optimizer, with non-maximum suppression and confidence thresholding applied during post-processing to refine detections. Performance was assessed using precision, recall, mAP, and loss metrics. Early epochs were marked by high classification and box losses, which reduced significantly by epoch 5. Precision and recall improved consistently, with precision increasing from 0.81 to 0.74 and recall stabilizing around 0.72–0.78. Middle epochs (6–20) showed stabilization in losses, with box loss reducing to 0.7–0.8 and classification loss to 0.4–0.5. Performance metrics peaked during this phase, achieving a precision of 0.90, recall of 0.84, and mAP@50 and mAP@50-95 values of 0.90 and 0.74, respectively. During the final epochs (21–25), the model achieved optimal stability, with box loss around 0.69 and classification loss at 0.37. Precision remained at 0.90, recall at 0.85, and mAP metrics stabilized at 0.91 and 0.74. A comparative analysis underscored YOLOv8’s superiority over YOLOv5, achieving higher F1-score (0.87 vs. 0.67), mAP@50 (0.91 vs. 0.682), and mAP@50-95 (0.74 vs. 0.449). YOLOv8’s architectural advancements like anchor-free detection head and optimized backbone improved object detection. YOLOv8’s balance of precision and recall, supported by strong post-processing, affirms its robustness for real-world applications.

Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringVol. 31(4)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.