Kesulitan konseptual dan prosedural siswa smp dalam materi kesebangunan

This study aims to identify the various types of difficulties students experience in understanding the concept of similarity, as well as to uncover the underlying factors contributing to these difficulties. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through diagnostic tests and in-depth interviews with seventh-grade students at a junior high school in the city of Tasikmalaya. Thematic analysis revealed four main types of difficulties faced by students: (1) difficulty in identifying the properties of similar figures, (2) difficulty in determining corresponding sides, (3) difficulty in applying the conditions of similarity in problem-solving, and (4) difficulty in visualizing similar plane figures. The contributing factors include conceptual misconceptions, the dominance of procedural learning, limited visual practice, and the lack of contextual and meaningful instructional strategies. These findings highlight the importance of reformulating geometry teaching approaches toward models that are more representational, reflective, and centered on students’ conceptual understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika PowerMathEdu
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v4i1.2623
Primary Topic
STEM Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kesulitan konseptual dan prosedural siswa smp dalam materi kesebangunan

Dedi Muhtadi, Sukirwan Sukirwan, Silvi Solihah
Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika PowerMathEdu
STEM Education
article

Kesulitan konseptual dan prosedural siswa smp dalam materi kesebangunan

Dedi Muhtadi, Sukirwan Sukirwan, Silvi Solihah
article en

Abstract

This study aims to identify the various types of difficulties students experience in understanding the concept of similarity, as well as to uncover the underlying factors contributing to these difficulties. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through diagnostic tests and in-depth interviews with seventh-grade students at a junior high school in the city of Tasikmalaya. Thematic analysis revealed four main types of difficulties faced by students: (1) difficulty in identifying the properties of similar figures, (2) difficulty in determining corresponding sides, (3) difficulty in applying the conditions of similarity in problem-solving, and (4) difficulty in visualizing similar plane figures. The contributing factors include conceptual misconceptions, the dominance of procedural learning, limited visual practice, and the lack of contextual and meaningful instructional strategies. These findings highlight the importance of reformulating geometry teaching approaches toward models that are more representational, reflective, and centered on students’ conceptual understanding.

Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika PowerMathEduVol. 4(1)
Siliwangi University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
STEM Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.