Lack of consistency in truck driver fatigue management: Australian law enforcement officer’s and transport regulation agent’s perceptions of enforcement

• Limited foundational training affects practice knowledge. • Limited practice knowledge undermines confidence and enforcement actions. • Use of discretionary powers may mask skill gaps. • Exposure to truck driver fatigue incidents reinforces enforcement practice. • Self-motivated field learning positively affects knowledge and practice skills. Truck driver fatigue is regarded as a serious safety hazard and a leading factor in road crashes in the Australian road transport industry. Since 2014 most Australian states have enforced truck driver fatigue regulation via restrictive work hours. Despite the implementation of these control measures, truck driver fatigue remains a safety issue, exacerbated by inconsistent regulation between the organisations and functionaries tasked with its management. This study presents the findings from semi-structured interviews conducted with law enforcement officers (LEO) and transport regulation agents (TRA) to determine factors that influence their intentions and behaviours regarding the enforcement of truck driver fatigue (TDF) regulations. Ajzen, 2005 Theory of Planned Behaviour was used to examine the factors that enable or disenable TDF enforcement, and how different perceptions within and between these cohorts often lead to inconsistent enforcement outcomes. Six main themes emerged from the study: 1) Limited foundational training affects practice knowledge, 2) Limited practice knowledge undermines confidence and enforcement actions, 3) Use of discretionary powers may mask skill gaps, 4) Competing occupational demands constrain TDF enforcement, 5) Exposure to TDF incidents reinforces enforcement practice, and 6) Self-motivated field learning positively affects knowledge and practice skills. The findings from this study offer original insight into a previously under-researched area regarding the factors which affect the enforcement of truck driver fatigue laws in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.04.007
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lack of consistency in truck driver fatigue management: Australian law enforcement officer’s and transport regulation agent’s perceptions of enforcement

Garry Stevens, Toby Miles‐Johnson, Gregory J. Casey
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Lack of consistency in truck driver fatigue management: Australian law enforcement officer’s and transport regulation agent’s perceptions of enforcement

Garry Stevens, Toby Miles‐Johnson, Gregory J. Casey
article en

Abstract

• Limited foundational training affects practice knowledge. • Limited practice knowledge undermines confidence and enforcement actions. • Use of discretionary powers may mask skill gaps. • Exposure to truck driver fatigue incidents reinforces enforcement practice. • Self-motivated field learning positively affects knowledge and practice skills. Truck driver fatigue is regarded as a serious safety hazard and a leading factor in road crashes in the Australian road transport industry. Since 2014 most Australian states have enforced truck driver fatigue regulation via restrictive work hours. Despite the implementation of these control measures, truck driver fatigue remains a safety issue, exacerbated by inconsistent regulation between the organisations and functionaries tasked with its management. This study presents the findings from semi-structured interviews conducted with law enforcement officers (LEO) and transport regulation agents (TRA) to determine factors that influence their intentions and behaviours regarding the enforcement of truck driver fatigue (TDF) regulations. Ajzen, 2005 Theory of Planned Behaviour was used to examine the factors that enable or disenable TDF enforcement, and how different perceptions within and between these cohorts often lead to inconsistent enforcement outcomes. Six main themes emerged from the study: 1) Limited foundational training affects practice knowledge, 2) Limited practice knowledge undermines confidence and enforcement actions, 3) Use of discretionary powers may mask skill gaps, 4) Competing occupational demands constrain TDF enforcement, 5) Exposure to TDF incidents reinforces enforcement practice, and 6) Self-motivated field learning positively affects knowledge and practice skills. The findings from this study offer original insight into a previously under-researched area regarding the factors which affect the enforcement of truck driver fatigue laws in Australia.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 112
Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.