PARAINSTITUTIONS AS A LATENT STRATEGY OF INSTITUTIONAL CRITIQUE IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN ART

The article is devoted to the Russian realization of a conceptual art movement known as institutional critique. In many countries of the Western world and in some others the tradition of institutional critique is an important component of the local context. At the same time, institutional critique as a global phenomenon had a decisive influence on art in the last quarter of the 20th century, but it has never been systematically studied in Russia. Two strategies of Russian institutional critique – manifest and latent – are distinguished by the author. The latent strategy is implemented through the creation of parainstitutions – speculative organizations. Based on the results of analyzing the principles of work of the selected parainstitutions, it was assumed that artists began to use the institution as a medium. This trend can be characterized as one of the main vectors of institutional critique in the conditions of the so-called “postcritical turn”.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Articult
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2227-6165-2025-1-35-49
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PARAINSTITUTIONS AS A LATENT STRATEGY OF INSTITUTIONAL CRITIQUE IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN ART

Timur K. Allakhverdiev
Articult
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

PARAINSTITUTIONS AS A LATENT STRATEGY OF INSTITUTIONAL CRITIQUE IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN ART

Timur K. Allakhverdiev
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the Russian realization of a conceptual art movement known as institutional critique. In many countries of the Western world and in some others the tradition of institutional critique is an important component of the local context. At the same time, institutional critique as a global phenomenon had a decisive influence on art in the last quarter of the 20th century, but it has never been systematically studied in Russia. Two strategies of Russian institutional critique – manifest and latent – are distinguished by the author. The latent strategy is implemented through the creation of parainstitutions – speculative organizations. Based on the results of analyzing the principles of work of the selected parainstitutions, it was assumed that artists began to use the institution as a medium. This trend can be characterized as one of the main vectors of institutional critique in the conditions of the so-called “postcritical turn”.

Articult(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PARAINSTITUTIONS AS A LATENT STRATEGY OF INSTITUTIONAL CRITIQUE IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN ART — Timur K. Allakhverdiev · Articult (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS