Who holds the pendulum?

Societal and pedagogical tensions have defined the complex and unstable historical development of literature teaching as a curricular area. To understand this volatile process, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the sociopolitical phenomena and the theoretical-methodological trends that have characterised the history of literature teaching in the context of first-language basic education. We thus thematically analysed 33 articles (indexed in Scopus and Web of Science) developed under historical research. In this article, the analysis of the bibliometric tendencies and the results from four of the twelve categories revealed (‘content’, teaching ‘goal’, ‘literature concept’ and ‘oeuvre’ selection criteria) demonstrate that literature teaching evolves slowly due to the weight of nationalist, historiographical and instrumental baggage that characterised its genesis. Because of that, new theoretical-methodological currents have less representation than expected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2025.25.1.752
Primary Topic
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who holds the pendulum?

Andressa Jove Godoy, Amélia Lopes
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
article

Who holds the pendulum?

Andressa Jove Godoy, Amélia Lopes
article en

Abstract

Societal and pedagogical tensions have defined the complex and unstable historical development of literature teaching as a curricular area. To understand this volatile process, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the sociopolitical phenomena and the theoretical-methodological trends that have characterised the history of literature teaching in the context of first-language basic education. We thus thematically analysed 33 articles (indexed in Scopus and Web of Science) developed under historical research. In this article, the analysis of the bibliometric tendencies and the results from four of the twelve categories revealed (‘content’, teaching ‘goal’, ‘literature concept’ and ‘oeuvre’ selection criteria) demonstrate that literature teaching evolves slowly due to the weight of nationalist, historiographical and instrumental baggage that characterised its genesis. Because of that, new theoretical-methodological currents have less representation than expected.

L1 Educational Studies in Language and LiteratureVol. 25(1)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Centro de Estudos para a Intervencao Social (PT), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT)
European Commission, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.