Patterns of prescribing contact lenses in Limpopo province, South Africa

Background: Contact lens (CL) prescribing is an essential strategy in vision correction. Patterns of CL prescribing are poorly reported globally, particularly in African countries irrespective of the high prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and corneal ectasia which can be corrected with CLs. Aim: This study aimed to determine the patterns of CL prescribing, their determinants, barriers and enablers among private practice optometrists in Limpopo, South Africa. Setting: Participants were optometrists from Limpopo province, South Africa. Methods: The study used a quantitative, cross-sectional, survey design, and data on the prescribing patterns of CLs were obtained through a self-administered online survey distributed to private practice optometrists in Limpopo, South Africa. Results: Ninety (43.0%) of optometrists completed the questionnaires from which 88 (94.9%) were Black African and had a mean age of 29.77 ± 7.21 years. While 74 (82.2%) participants reported to fit CLs, 48 (64.9%) participants reported to initiate conversations of CL wear to their patients. The mean self-reported knowledge and competencies score was good at 3.65 ± 0.71 using the Likert scale. Soft material (100%) and spherical designs (90.5%) were fitted the most by participants. Patient affordability (68.9%), poor patient motivation (52.7%) and poor lens tolerance (44.6%) were cited as the most common barriers to fitting CLs among participants who fitted CLs. The lack of equipment (62.5%), poor patient motivation (62.5%) and trial CL availability (37.5%) were the common barriers to CL fitting among participants who reported not fitting CLs. Conclusion: Majority of participants were fitting soft spherical CL. Patient affordability together with a lack of motivation and a lack of equipment were the reported barriers to CL prescribing. It is essential to develop a comprehensive strategy aimed at encouraging practitioners to adopt CL use while simultaneously equipping them with the necessary skills and resources for effective CL fitting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African vision and eye health
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v84i1.954
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of prescribing contact lenses in Limpopo province, South Africa

Nonkazimulo Shabalala, Pheagane M.W. Nkoana, Velibanti Nhlanhla Sukati, Raelyn M.R. Madiga et al.
African vision and eye health
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Patterns of prescribing contact lenses in Limpopo province, South Africa

Nonkazimulo Shabalala, Pheagane M.W. Nkoana, Velibanti Nhlanhla Sukati, Raelyn M.R. Madiga, Rendani P. Netshirungulu, Machukudu A. Maponya, Elizabeth Moroka, Andani Mavhungu
article en

Abstract

Background: Contact lens (CL) prescribing is an essential strategy in vision correction. Patterns of CL prescribing are poorly reported globally, particularly in African countries irrespective of the high prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and corneal ectasia which can be corrected with CLs. Aim: This study aimed to determine the patterns of CL prescribing, their determinants, barriers and enablers among private practice optometrists in Limpopo, South Africa. Setting: Participants were optometrists from Limpopo province, South Africa. Methods: The study used a quantitative, cross-sectional, survey design, and data on the prescribing patterns of CLs were obtained through a self-administered online survey distributed to private practice optometrists in Limpopo, South Africa. Results: Ninety (43.0%) of optometrists completed the questionnaires from which 88 (94.9%) were Black African and had a mean age of 29.77 ± 7.21 years. While 74 (82.2%) participants reported to fit CLs, 48 (64.9%) participants reported to initiate conversations of CL wear to their patients. The mean self-reported knowledge and competencies score was good at 3.65 ± 0.71 using the Likert scale. Soft material (100%) and spherical designs (90.5%) were fitted the most by participants. Patient affordability (68.9%), poor patient motivation (52.7%) and poor lens tolerance (44.6%) were cited as the most common barriers to fitting CLs among participants who fitted CLs. The lack of equipment (62.5%), poor patient motivation (62.5%) and trial CL availability (37.5%) were the common barriers to CL fitting among participants who reported not fitting CLs. Conclusion: Majority of participants were fitting soft spherical CL. Patient affordability together with a lack of motivation and a lack of equipment were the reported barriers to CL prescribing. It is essential to develop a comprehensive strategy aimed at encouraging practitioners to adopt CL use while simultaneously equipping them with the necessary skills and resources for effective CL fitting.

African vision and eye healthVol. 84(1)
University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.