Investigating the Relationship Among Communicative Gestures and Words in Tamil-speaking Children With Down Syndrome

Objectives: Gestural usage is one of the earliest signs of intentional communication abilities. In children with down syndrome (DS), one of the most severely compromised areas of functioning is language. In the linguistic profile of children with DS, gesture use and receptive vocabulary are relative strengths. The present study examines the relative use of types of gestures and words in children with DS. Also, this study compares that with a group of expressive language, ability-matched typically developing (TD) children. Additionally, the present research verifies the relationship between total gestures and word production by children with DS and expressive language ability-matched TD children. Methods: In this prospective study, 30 Tamil-speaking children (15 children in the DS group and 15 children in the TD group) and their parents participated. The parents were asked to play with their children normally, as they do at home, using the set of toys given, and this session was recorded in video. Deictic gestures and words, as well as representational gestures and words, were analyzed with a specific coding scheme. Results: The DS group used more deictic gestures (Mean±SD, 35±14.10) compared to deictic words (Mean±SD, 2.73±1.79), with a significant difference (P<0.05, Z=-3.40, P=0.00064). Also, children with DS used more representational words (Mean±SD, 46.13±22.63) than representational gestures (Mean±SD, 12.53±8.20), with a significant difference (Z=-3.29, P=0.001). Meanwhile, this was found to be a moderately positive correlation between overall gesture and word production in the DS group (rs=0.574, P=0.02) and TD group (rs=0.558, P=0.03). This study revealed no significant difference between children in the DS and TD groups regarding the use of deictic gestures and words. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the use of representative gestures (P=0.0018) and words (P=0.02) between DS and TD groups. Children in the DS group used more representational gestures compared to children in the TD group. Discussion: Children in the DS group exhibited an association between gesture and word production during parent-child interaction, which is similar to children in the TD group. This relationship persists despite specific issues with DS children’s expressive language traits. Children in the DS group used more representational gestures compared to children in the TD group to compensate for their deficits in speech and language skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32598/irj.23.1.2159.1
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Relationship Among Communicative Gestures and Words in Tamil-speaking Children With Down Syndrome

M. K. Rajasekar, Powlin Arockia Catherine, V. Monish
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Investigating the Relationship Among Communicative Gestures and Words in Tamil-speaking Children With Down Syndrome

M. K. Rajasekar, Powlin Arockia Catherine, V. Monish
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Gestural usage is one of the earliest signs of intentional communication abilities. In children with down syndrome (DS), one of the most severely compromised areas of functioning is language. In the linguistic profile of children with DS, gesture use and receptive vocabulary are relative strengths. The present study examines the relative use of types of gestures and words in children with DS. Also, this study compares that with a group of expressive language, ability-matched typically developing (TD) children. Additionally, the present research verifies the relationship between total gestures and word production by children with DS and expressive language ability-matched TD children. Methods: In this prospective study, 30 Tamil-speaking children (15 children in the DS group and 15 children in the TD group) and their parents participated. The parents were asked to play with their children normally, as they do at home, using the set of toys given, and this session was recorded in video. Deictic gestures and words, as well as representational gestures and words, were analyzed with a specific coding scheme. Results: The DS group used more deictic gestures (Mean±SD, 35±14.10) compared to deictic words (Mean±SD, 2.73±1.79), with a significant difference (P<0.05, Z=-3.40, P=0.00064). Also, children with DS used more representational words (Mean±SD, 46.13±22.63) than representational gestures (Mean±SD, 12.53±8.20), with a significant difference (Z=-3.29, P=0.001). Meanwhile, this was found to be a moderately positive correlation between overall gesture and word production in the DS group (rs=0.574, P=0.02) and TD group (rs=0.558, P=0.03). This study revealed no significant difference between children in the DS and TD groups regarding the use of deictic gestures and words. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the use of representative gestures (P=0.0018) and words (P=0.02) between DS and TD groups. Children in the DS group used more representational gestures compared to children in the TD group. Discussion: Children in the DS group exhibited an association between gesture and word production during parent-child interaction, which is similar to children in the TD group. This relationship persists despite specific issues with DS children’s expressive language traits. Children in the DS group used more representational gestures compared to children in the TD group to compensate for their deficits in speech and language skills.

Iranian Rehabilitation JournalVol. 23(01)
Bharath University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.