Deficit Irrigation and Source of Water: Possible Mitigation Option of Arsenic Load in Fodder Maize and Cowpea in Lower Gangetic Plain Zone of West Bengal, India

The objective of this experiment is to reduce arsenic uptake in fodder crops by managing through frequency of irrigation water and sources. Farmers of West Bengal grow fodder crops like maize, cowpea, lucerne, etc. in arsenic (As) contaminated areas during the winter season (November to March) under irrigated conditions. The experiment was executed in the arsenic-contaminated village (Ghentugachhi) with a Latitude of N 23º1'19.9" and Longitude of E 88º34'31.8", West Bengal, India during winter seasons 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. The total arsenic (As) found in the shallow tube well water was 0.120 mg L-1 (mean value) and the total arsenic content in pond water was 0.040 mg L-1 (mean value). The experiment was planned in a factorial experiment in a split-split plot design. The number of crops was two (fodder maize and cowpea), the source of irrigation was two and the frequency of irrigation was three. The crops were, therefore, tested against two sources of irrigation viz.: (i) Pond water and (ii) shallow tube well water; and frequency of irrigation water viz.: (i) Irrigation at 20 Days After Sowing (DAS), (ii) Irrigation at 20 and 35 DAS and (iii) Irrigation at 20, 35 and 50 DAS. The cowpea fodder crop received comparatively less arsenic uptake than maize fodder. Pond water irrigated fodder crops show significantly less arsenic concentration in plant parts compared to shallow tube well water irrigated fodder crops. The frequency of irrigation considerably showed the variation of arsenic concentration in fodder crops. The crops irrigated with single irrigation showed less arsenic uptake in plant parts than the two or three irrigation. Among the edible parts leaf arsenic uptake is less than the shoots.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2025/v15i44825
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deficit Irrigation and Source of Water: Possible Mitigation Option of Arsenic Load in Fodder Maize and Cowpea in Lower Gangetic Plain Zone of West Bengal, India

D. Tamang, Naorem Meena Devi, Swadhin Das, Md. Hedayetullah et al.
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
Agricultural Economics and Practices
article

Deficit Irrigation and Source of Water: Possible Mitigation Option of Arsenic Load in Fodder Maize and Cowpea in Lower Gangetic Plain Zone of West Bengal, India

D. Tamang, Naorem Meena Devi, Swadhin Das, Md. Hedayetullah, C. K. Kundu
article en

Abstract

The objective of this experiment is to reduce arsenic uptake in fodder crops by managing through frequency of irrigation water and sources. Farmers of West Bengal grow fodder crops like maize, cowpea, lucerne, etc. in arsenic (As) contaminated areas during the winter season (November to March) under irrigated conditions. The experiment was executed in the arsenic-contaminated village (Ghentugachhi) with a Latitude of N 23º1'19.9" and Longitude of E 88º34'31.8", West Bengal, India during winter seasons 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. The total arsenic (As) found in the shallow tube well water was 0.120 mg L-1 (mean value) and the total arsenic content in pond water was 0.040 mg L-1 (mean value). The experiment was planned in a factorial experiment in a split-split plot design. The number of crops was two (fodder maize and cowpea), the source of irrigation was two and the frequency of irrigation was three. The crops were, therefore, tested against two sources of irrigation viz.: (i) Pond water and (ii) shallow tube well water; and frequency of irrigation water viz.: (i) Irrigation at 20 Days After Sowing (DAS), (ii) Irrigation at 20 and 35 DAS and (iii) Irrigation at 20, 35 and 50 DAS. The cowpea fodder crop received comparatively less arsenic uptake than maize fodder. Pond water irrigated fodder crops show significantly less arsenic concentration in plant parts compared to shallow tube well water irrigated fodder crops. The frequency of irrigation considerably showed the variation of arsenic concentration in fodder crops. The crops irrigated with single irrigation showed less arsenic uptake in plant parts than the two or three irrigation. Among the edible parts leaf arsenic uptake is less than the shoots.

International Journal of Environment and Climate ChangeVol. 15(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Agricultural Economics and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.