Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Metode Praktikum

Abstract. The study was conducted in two cycles, consisting of: planning, implementation, analysis, reflection. The first cycle is obtained, the students activity consider the teacher's explanation 57.14%, using the laboratory equipment of 22.86%. cooperation between students in the group 28.57%, asking questions11.43%, answering teachers questions 45.71%, expressed ideas 8.57%, draw conclusions 42.85%. make reporting 51.43%, punctuality 42.86%. Learning outcomes mean 66.60, highs 79.00, lows 53.00, classical completeness 57.14%. In the second cycle of the student activity increased to 94.28%. Using laboratory equipment 85.71%. cooperation between of students in the group 71.43%, asking the question 40%, answered questions teachers 82.86%, expressed the idea 28.57%, summed 80.00%. makereporting 97.15%, punctuality 85.71%, and learning outcomes mean of 77.80, 89.00 highs, lows 63.00 88.57% classical completeness.published work. Keywords: Learning Activities, Learning Outcomes, Practical Methods, Classroom Action Research

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Pedagogical and Social Sciences
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26858/.v4i1.57565
Primary Topic
STEM Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Metode Praktikum

Mohammad Yunus, Mutahharah Hasyim, Sulaeman Sulaeman, Muhammad Kahar
Indonesian Journal of Pedagogical and Social Sciences
STEM Education
article

Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Metode Praktikum

Mohammad Yunus, Mutahharah Hasyim, Sulaeman Sulaeman, Muhammad Kahar
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The study was conducted in two cycles, consisting of: planning, implementation, analysis, reflection. The first cycle is obtained, the students activity consider the teacher's explanation 57.14%, using the laboratory equipment of 22.86%. cooperation between students in the group 28.57%, asking questions11.43%, answering teachers questions 45.71%, expressed ideas 8.57%, draw conclusions 42.85%. make reporting 51.43%, punctuality 42.86%. Learning outcomes mean 66.60, highs 79.00, lows 53.00, classical completeness 57.14%. In the second cycle of the student activity increased to 94.28%. Using laboratory equipment 85.71%. cooperation between of students in the group 71.43%, asking the question 40%, answered questions teachers 82.86%, expressed the idea 28.57%, summed 80.00%. makereporting 97.15%, punctuality 85.71%, and learning outcomes mean of 77.80, 89.00 highs, lows 63.00 88.57% classical completeness.published work. Keywords: Learning Activities, Learning Outcomes, Practical Methods, Classroom Action Research

Indonesian Journal of Pedagogical and Social SciencesVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
STEM Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.