Evaluating the possibly-corrosive effects of four different mouthwashes on orthodontic brackets and bands: an exploratory, in-vitro, comparative study

Mouthwashes have always been an essential component in the recipe for good oral hygiene. Orthodontic patients are generally advised to use mouthwashes regularly, as an adjunct to other mouth-cleaning methods. Many studies have investigated the effects of mouthwashes on the dental and gingival structures. However, only few studies have examined some of the interactions between orthodontic brackets/bands and these important oral healthcare pillars, fewer are the studies which have looked into various kinds of mouthwashes. This study aimed to evaluate the possibly-corrosive effects of 4 different mouthwashes. 1200 stainless-steel orthodontic brackets and 480 stainless-steel orthodontic bands were separately immersed in the 4 following mouthwashes: fluoride 2500 ppm, chlorhexidine 0.12%, propolis 5%, and physiological saline of NaCl 0.9%. 15 containers were used for each mouthwash type, simulating having 60 patients in total. In every container, hence, there were 20 stainless-steel brackets (the same as in the typical orthodontic kit used per patient), or 8 bands (assuming the banding of all first and second permanent molars of the patient). The duration of soaking was 3 months. The used mouthwashes liquids were renewed on a weekly basis. The brackets and bands weights were measured with a precision of 0.0000 g at baseline (T0) and after the three-month period (T1). Mostly all study groups exhibited a trend of weight loss, with statistically significant differences amongst the groups. Physiological saline had the greatest weight loss, followed by fluoride, propolis, and chlorhexidine, respectively. All mouthwashes had a sort of slight corrosive impact on the orthodontic brackets/bands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06973-8
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the possibly-corrosive effects of four different mouthwashes on orthodontic brackets and bands: an exploratory, in-vitro, comparative study

Mohamed Altinawi, Muhammed Al-Huda Ballouk, Piotr Stanisław Fudalej, Talar S. Zeitounlouian et al.
4 citations
Discover Applied Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
6.70
article

Evaluating the possibly-corrosive effects of four different mouthwashes on orthodontic brackets and bands: an exploratory, in-vitro, comparative study

Mohamed Altinawi, Muhammed Al-Huda Ballouk, Piotr Stanisław Fudalej, Talar S. Zeitounlouian, Abeer Al-Kafri
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Mouthwashes have always been an essential component in the recipe for good oral hygiene. Orthodontic patients are generally advised to use mouthwashes regularly, as an adjunct to other mouth-cleaning methods. Many studies have investigated the effects of mouthwashes on the dental and gingival structures. However, only few studies have examined some of the interactions between orthodontic brackets/bands and these important oral healthcare pillars, fewer are the studies which have looked into various kinds of mouthwashes. This study aimed to evaluate the possibly-corrosive effects of 4 different mouthwashes. 1200 stainless-steel orthodontic brackets and 480 stainless-steel orthodontic bands were separately immersed in the 4 following mouthwashes: fluoride 2500 ppm, chlorhexidine 0.12%, propolis 5%, and physiological saline of NaCl 0.9%. 15 containers were used for each mouthwash type, simulating having 60 patients in total. In every container, hence, there were 20 stainless-steel brackets (the same as in the typical orthodontic kit used per patient), or 8 bands (assuming the banding of all first and second permanent molars of the patient). The duration of soaking was 3 months. The used mouthwashes liquids were renewed on a weekly basis. The brackets and bands weights were measured with a precision of 0.0000 g at baseline (T0) and after the three-month period (T1). Mostly all study groups exhibited a trend of weight loss, with statistically significant differences amongst the groups. Physiological saline had the greatest weight loss, followed by fluoride, propolis, and chlorhexidine, respectively. All mouthwashes had a sort of slight corrosive impact on the orthodontic brackets/bands.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 7(5)
University of Bern (CH), Jagiellonian University (PL), Damascus University (SY)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Dental materials and restorations
6.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.