Teacher perceptions of critical race theory and multicultural education in “dangerous times”

Purpose This paper aims to examine teachers’ perspectives on their understandings of multicultural education (MCE) and critical race theory (CRT) in today’s classrooms, exploring the challenges and opportunities they face in fostering an inclusive educational environment. This study highlights the political and systemic barriers, hindering these practices and the resilience of educators committed to advancing equity. Design/methodology/approach The authors used ethnographic design and conducted two focus groups with educators, using holistic coding to identify key themes and distinctions between MCE and CRT. This study explores the impact of political and administrative pressures, teacher preparation and the difficulties of navigating a politically charged climate around race and inclusivity. Findings Teachers acknowledged the value of MCE and CRT in addressing systemic inequities but cited challenges such as insufficient teacher training, lack of administrative support and political backlash. Despite these obstacles, they demonstrated a strong commitment to creating safe, inclusive spaces for students and advocated for systemic change. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study are constrained by its small sample size, as only nine educators participated across two focus groups, limiting the generalizability of the results. In addition, the study’s geographic focus on Ohio educators may not fully capture the broader national perspectives on MCE and CRT. Despite these limitations, the research provides valuable insights into how political and administrative pressures shape educators’ understandings of diversity, equity and inclusion concepts. Future studies could expand the sample size and include educators from more diverse regions to build on these findings and enhance their applicability. Practical implications This paper offers recommendations for improving teacher preparation and support systems, emphasizing the need for policies that foster inclusive education. It calls for holistic teacher training that equips educators with the tools to integrate MCE and CRT into their classrooms effectively. Social implications This paper highlights the importance of supporting educators in fostering inclusive classrooms and addressing systemic inequities. It emphasizes how political and administrative pressures affect teachers’ abilities to engage in critical conversations about race and inclusivity. The findings call for systemic changes to teacher preparation programs and policies that equip educators to integrate MCE and CRT effectively, promoting social justice through education. Originality/value This research contributes to the discourse on inclusive education by providing insights into the real-world challenges educators face in implementing MCE and CRT, while also offering recommendations for advancing these frameworks in schools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Multicultural Education
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-01-2025-0008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teacher perceptions of critical race theory and multicultural education in “dangerous times”

Brittany Aronson, Haniyeh Kheirkhah
2 citations
Journal for Multicultural Education
Critical Race Theory in Education
8.40
article

Teacher perceptions of critical race theory and multicultural education in “dangerous times”

Brittany Aronson, Haniyeh Kheirkhah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine teachers’ perspectives on their understandings of multicultural education (MCE) and critical race theory (CRT) in today’s classrooms, exploring the challenges and opportunities they face in fostering an inclusive educational environment. This study highlights the political and systemic barriers, hindering these practices and the resilience of educators committed to advancing equity. Design/methodology/approach The authors used ethnographic design and conducted two focus groups with educators, using holistic coding to identify key themes and distinctions between MCE and CRT. This study explores the impact of political and administrative pressures, teacher preparation and the difficulties of navigating a politically charged climate around race and inclusivity. Findings Teachers acknowledged the value of MCE and CRT in addressing systemic inequities but cited challenges such as insufficient teacher training, lack of administrative support and political backlash. Despite these obstacles, they demonstrated a strong commitment to creating safe, inclusive spaces for students and advocated for systemic change. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study are constrained by its small sample size, as only nine educators participated across two focus groups, limiting the generalizability of the results. In addition, the study’s geographic focus on Ohio educators may not fully capture the broader national perspectives on MCE and CRT. Despite these limitations, the research provides valuable insights into how political and administrative pressures shape educators’ understandings of diversity, equity and inclusion concepts. Future studies could expand the sample size and include educators from more diverse regions to build on these findings and enhance their applicability. Practical implications This paper offers recommendations for improving teacher preparation and support systems, emphasizing the need for policies that foster inclusive education. It calls for holistic teacher training that equips educators with the tools to integrate MCE and CRT into their classrooms effectively. Social implications This paper highlights the importance of supporting educators in fostering inclusive classrooms and addressing systemic inequities. It emphasizes how political and administrative pressures affect teachers’ abilities to engage in critical conversations about race and inclusivity. The findings call for systemic changes to teacher preparation programs and policies that equip educators to integrate MCE and CRT effectively, promoting social justice through education. Originality/value This research contributes to the discourse on inclusive education by providing insights into the real-world challenges educators face in implementing MCE and CRT, while also offering recommendations for advancing these frameworks in schools.

Journal for Multicultural EducationVol. 19(2-3)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Critical Race Theory in Education
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.