Integrative Taxonomy for Species Delimitation: A Case Study in Two Widely Accepted Yet Morphologically Confounding <i>Rosa</i> Species Within Sect. <i>Pimpinellifoliae</i> (Rosaceae)

The use of morphological traits as a practical approach for delimiting taxa at various ranks has long been regarded as a reliable basis for taxonomy. However, its efficacy has been increasingly called into question in many taxonomic groups due to its inherent limitations, such as failing to account for phenotypic plasticity, ecologically driven variation (e.g., ecotypes), and parallel evolution. These factors often introduce ambiguity or misleading similarities, thereby obscuring the true evolutionary relationships among taxa, particularly in the context of species delimitation. In the present study, we employ an integrated methodology that combines quantitative morphological analyses, whole-genome data, and ecological measurements to resolve the species boundaries of two morphologically similar roses, Rosa sericea and Rosa hugonis, which have long been considered as two distinct species but lack clear morphological boundaries. Our findings reveal that the unbiased analysis of morphological data based on a large and representative sample size was insufficient to identify effective diagnostic traits. However, when complemented with genome-wide population-level sequencing data or integrated with geographic and ecological niche assessments, the delineation of species boundaries was significantly improved. Furthermore, ecological data provide additional insight into the abiotic factors driving interspecific and intraspecific divergence. By integrating multiple lines of evidence-spanning genomic (intrinsic) and phenotypic (extrinsic) traits-and incorporating the interaction between species and their environments, species boundaries can be delineated with greater confidence. A well-defined species can thus be established through the mutual corroboration of diverse datasets, thereby ensuring a more rigorous and comprehensive taxonomic framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Ecology
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17779
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Botanical Studies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrative Taxonomy for Species Delimitation: A Case Study in Two Widely Accepted Yet Morphologically Confounding Rosa Species Within Sect. Pimpinellifoliae (Rosaceae)

Yun‐Dong Gao, Yu Feng, Jingbo Wang, Fazal Ullah et al.
5 citations
Molecular Ecology
Botanical Studies and Applications
8.75
article

Integrative Taxonomy for Species Delimitation: A Case Study in Two Widely Accepted Yet Morphologically Confounding Rosa Species Within Sect. Pimpinellifoliae (Rosaceae)

Yun‐Dong Gao, Yu Feng, Jingbo Wang, Fazal Ullah, Yu-Mei Yuan, Meng Yuan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The use of morphological traits as a practical approach for delimiting taxa at various ranks has long been regarded as a reliable basis for taxonomy. However, its efficacy has been increasingly called into question in many taxonomic groups due to its inherent limitations, such as failing to account for phenotypic plasticity, ecologically driven variation (e.g., ecotypes), and parallel evolution. These factors often introduce ambiguity or misleading similarities, thereby obscuring the true evolutionary relationships among taxa, particularly in the context of species delimitation. In the present study, we employ an integrated methodology that combines quantitative morphological analyses, whole-genome data, and ecological measurements to resolve the species boundaries of two morphologically similar roses, Rosa sericea and Rosa hugonis, which have long been considered as two distinct species but lack clear morphological boundaries. Our findings reveal that the unbiased analysis of morphological data based on a large and representative sample size was insufficient to identify effective diagnostic traits. However, when complemented with genome-wide population-level sequencing data or integrated with geographic and ecological niche assessments, the delineation of species boundaries was significantly improved. Furthermore, ecological data provide additional insight into the abiotic factors driving interspecific and intraspecific divergence. By integrating multiple lines of evidence-spanning genomic (intrinsic) and phenotypic (extrinsic) traits-and incorporating the interaction between species and their environments, species boundaries can be delineated with greater confidence. A well-defined species can thus be established through the mutual corroboration of diverse datasets, thereby ensuring a more rigorous and comprehensive taxonomic framework.

Molecular EcologyVol. 34(21)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chengdu Institute of Biology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Northwest Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Botanical Studies and Applications
8.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.