Finding Geometric Variances from Nominal Measurements

This study worked to find differences between the measurements of what parts should be and what they actually were. When a part is manufactured, it is given a nominal measurement which provides the exact geometric numbers representing that section of the part. The true measurements of parts are almost never exactly the same as the nominal measurement, due to varying production issues during component manufacture. A Hexagon Laser Scanner (LS) was used to create computer generated figures of the parts, while Siemens NX, CATIA V5, Creo, Solidworks, and Inventor softwares were used to create Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models of the parts. A Hexagon Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) evaluated accurate dimensions for each part. The tolerances between the nominal measurements of the parts and the measurements found by the CMM were determined. This study served to find differences in parts between their design and manufactured artifact, by creating multiple versions of computer-generated models and operating a CMM on the parts themselves. It is important to accurately assess graphics standards for the betterment of products in industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American journal of rising scholar activities
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/2692-4161.1023
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding Geometric Variances from Nominal Measurements

Austin Bridenthal
American journal of rising scholar activities
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Finding Geometric Variances from Nominal Measurements

Austin Bridenthal
article en

Abstract

This study worked to find differences between the measurements of what parts should be and what they actually were. When a part is manufactured, it is given a nominal measurement which provides the exact geometric numbers representing that section of the part. The true measurements of parts are almost never exactly the same as the nominal measurement, due to varying production issues during component manufacture. A Hexagon Laser Scanner (LS) was used to create computer generated figures of the parts, while Siemens NX, CATIA V5, Creo, Solidworks, and Inventor softwares were used to create Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models of the parts. A Hexagon Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) evaluated accurate dimensions for each part. The tolerances between the nominal measurements of the parts and the measurements found by the CMM were determined. This study served to find differences in parts between their design and manufactured artifact, by creating multiple versions of computer-generated models and operating a CMM on the parts themselves. It is important to accurately assess graphics standards for the betterment of products in industry.

American journal of rising scholar activitiesVol. 3(1)
Indiana Christian University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.