Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 − metastatic breast cancer—a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study
It was apparent that participants faced side effects from treatment but undertook steps to manage these as much as possible. Adaptations were often led by a belief about the benefits of remaining on treatment. Adjustments ranged from modifying routines to carrying personal hygiene supplies when out in public in case of diarrhoea. While this was anticipated, other side effects were less well known with variable clinical support and available information. Family support was raised frequently, predominantly in relation to the impact MBC had on roles and relationships. Themes from this work can be thought of via theories about treatment belief and adherence, such as the common-sense and self-regulation models, as participants reflected on both emotional and cognitive coping strategies. Trial registration - ISRCTN17281696.
Authors
- Rachel Starkings (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-018X)
- Helena Harder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-8227)
- Lesley Fallowfield (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-4518)
- Valerie Shilling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-0321)
Institutions
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
- University of Sussex (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2025-04-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09444-3
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.04
Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company