Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 − metastatic breast cancer—a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study

It was apparent that participants faced side effects from treatment but undertook steps to manage these as much as possible. Adaptations were often led by a belief about the benefits of remaining on treatment. Adjustments ranged from modifying routines to carrying personal hygiene supplies when out in public in case of diarrhoea. While this was anticipated, other side effects were less well known with variable clinical support and available information. Family support was raised frequently, predominantly in relation to the impact MBC had on roles and relationships. Themes from this work can be thought of via theories about treatment belief and adherence, such as the common-sense and self-regulation models, as participants reflected on both emotional and cognitive coping strategies. Trial registration - ISRCTN17281696.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09444-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 − metastatic breast cancer—a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study

Rachel Starkings, Helena Harder, Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Shilling
2 citations
Supportive Care in Cancer
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
3.04
article

Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 − metastatic breast cancer—a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study

Rachel Starkings, Helena Harder, Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Shilling
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It was apparent that participants faced side effects from treatment but undertook steps to manage these as much as possible. Adaptations were often led by a belief about the benefits of remaining on treatment. Adjustments ranged from modifying routines to carrying personal hygiene supplies when out in public in case of diarrhoea. While this was anticipated, other side effects were less well known with variable clinical support and available information. Family support was raised frequently, predominantly in relation to the impact MBC had on roles and relationships. Themes from this work can be thought of via theories about treatment belief and adherence, such as the common-sense and self-regulation models, as participants reflected on both emotional and cognitive coping strategies. Trial registration - ISRCTN17281696.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 33(5)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University of Sussex (GB)
Eli Lilly and Company
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.