AI-based analysis of surgical outcomes in vitrectomy with and without cystotomy for refractory cystoid diabetic macular edema

The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in vitrectomy with and without cystotomy for refractory cystoid diabetic macular edema (DME). This study enrolled 35 eyes of 29 patients who underwent vitrectomy for refractory DME. The eyes were divided into 2 groups, those undergoing vitrectomy with cystotomy (cystotomy group) (n = 8) and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling only (ILM peeling group) (n = 27). The endpoints were central retinal thickness (CRT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular fluid (MF) area. The MF area was determined and measured using a semantic segmentation model "Hokkaido University MF segmentation model" and subdivided into inner MF (IMF) area bounded by the inner nuclear layer (INL), and outer MF (OMF) area between the outer border of INL and ellipsoid zone. The cystotomy group showed a significant reduction in CRT at 1 month postoperatively compared to the ILM peeling group (P < 0.05). The cystotomy group preserved BCVA at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. There was a significant difference between the cystotomy and the ILM peeling groups in the reduction of the OMF area at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.01). Cystotomy for refractory DME was more effective in reducing the OMF area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93847-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-based analysis of surgical outcomes in vitrectomy with and without cystotomy for refractory cystoid diabetic macular edema

Zhenyu Dong, Satoru Kase, Susumu Ishida, Ryõ Andõ et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
1.36
article

AI-based analysis of surgical outcomes in vitrectomy with and without cystotomy for refractory cystoid diabetic macular edema

Zhenyu Dong, Satoru Kase, Susumu Ishida, Ryõ Andõ, Mizuho Mitamura, Michiyuki Saito, Kiriko Nishiyama-Hirooka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in vitrectomy with and without cystotomy for refractory cystoid diabetic macular edema (DME). This study enrolled 35 eyes of 29 patients who underwent vitrectomy for refractory DME. The eyes were divided into 2 groups, those undergoing vitrectomy with cystotomy (cystotomy group) (n = 8) and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling only (ILM peeling group) (n = 27). The endpoints were central retinal thickness (CRT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular fluid (MF) area. The MF area was determined and measured using a semantic segmentation model "Hokkaido University MF segmentation model" and subdivided into inner MF (IMF) area bounded by the inner nuclear layer (INL), and outer MF (OMF) area between the outer border of INL and ellipsoid zone. The cystotomy group showed a significant reduction in CRT at 1 month postoperatively compared to the ILM peeling group (P < 0.05). The cystotomy group preserved BCVA at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. There was a significant difference between the cystotomy and the ILM peeling groups in the reduction of the OMF area at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.01). Cystotomy for refractory DME was more effective in reducing the OMF area.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hokkaido University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.