Role of Virtual Water from the Perspective of Generalized Trade

In practice, virtual water trade played a more important role in our daily life and production process than physical water trade. Virtual water trade was capable of alleviating the water scarcity issue by transferring virtual water embodied in products from water-rich regions to the water-scarce ones such as Urumqi. In practice, however, the transfer of virtual water was not always the case, and its direction could even be the opposite. For instance, in Xinjiang, a huge volume of virtual water was transferred to water-rich regions despite the local water scarcity. This paper applied the term of generalized trade to investigate the paradoxical scenario that went against comparative advantage theory, and revealed that virtual water trade never played a monodrama but participated in a chorus with physical water trade, virtual energy trade, virtual labor trade, virtual land trade and others. Specifically, generalized trade, as all these forms of trade combined, drew a multiple-perspective portrait of traditional trade, and contributed greatly to the sustainable development of an economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Economics and Policy
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x25400120
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Virtual Water from the Perspective of Generalized Trade

Yong Liu, Kexin Wang
1 citations
Water Economics and Policy
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Role of Virtual Water from the Perspective of Generalized Trade

Yong Liu, Kexin Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In practice, virtual water trade played a more important role in our daily life and production process than physical water trade. Virtual water trade was capable of alleviating the water scarcity issue by transferring virtual water embodied in products from water-rich regions to the water-scarce ones such as Urumqi. In practice, however, the transfer of virtual water was not always the case, and its direction could even be the opposite. For instance, in Xinjiang, a huge volume of virtual water was transferred to water-rich regions despite the local water scarcity. This paper applied the term of generalized trade to investigate the paradoxical scenario that went against comparative advantage theory, and revealed that virtual water trade never played a monodrama but participated in a chorus with physical water trade, virtual energy trade, virtual labor trade, virtual land trade and others. Specifically, generalized trade, as all these forms of trade combined, drew a multiple-perspective portrait of traditional trade, and contributed greatly to the sustainable development of an economy.

Water Economics and Policy
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), Shandong Institute of Agricultural Sustainable Development (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Role of Virtual Water from the Perspective of Generalized Trade — Yong Liu, Kexin Wang · Water Economics and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS