The Transfer of St. Metropolitan Filipp’s Relics to Moscow Reconsidered

Abstract This essay reconsiders the transfer of St. Filipp’s relics to Moscow in 1652, recognizing it as an act of historical replication founded on annual religious commemorations and intended to contextualize Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich’s inheritance of the Orthodox Byzantine legacy. Commemorations of Filipp, including his zhitie , were founded on the Life of St. John Chrysostom and on accounts of Emperor Theodosius II ’s translation of Chrysostom’s relics to Constantinople. The Chrysostom-Theodosian paradigm exemplified the disruption and restoration of the Byzantine concept of church-state harmony. Aleksei’s plea that Filipp “absolve the transgression of my great grandfather, Tsar Ivan” represents increasing efforts to associate the Russian saint with Chrysostom and to replicate the Byzantine past, rather than an unprecedented attempt by Nikon to degrade the tsar. The translation of Filipp’s relics informed Tsar Fedor Alekseevich’s return of Nikon from exile and Peter I ’s transfer of Alexander Nevskii’s relics to St. Petersburg.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian-American Slavic Studies
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30965/22102396-05902007
Primary Topic
Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Transfer of St. Metropolitan Filipp’s Relics to Moscow Reconsidered

Kevin M. Kain
Canadian-American Slavic Studies
Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
article

The Transfer of St. Metropolitan Filipp’s Relics to Moscow Reconsidered

Kevin M. Kain
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay reconsiders the transfer of St. Filipp’s relics to Moscow in 1652, recognizing it as an act of historical replication founded on annual religious commemorations and intended to contextualize Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich’s inheritance of the Orthodox Byzantine legacy. Commemorations of Filipp, including his zhitie , were founded on the Life of St. John Chrysostom and on accounts of Emperor Theodosius II ’s translation of Chrysostom’s relics to Constantinople. The Chrysostom-Theodosian paradigm exemplified the disruption and restoration of the Byzantine concept of church-state harmony. Aleksei’s plea that Filipp “absolve the transgression of my great grandfather, Tsar Ivan” represents increasing efforts to associate the Russian saint with Chrysostom and to replicate the Byzantine past, rather than an unprecedented attempt by Nikon to degrade the tsar. The translation of Filipp’s relics informed Tsar Fedor Alekseevich’s return of Nikon from exile and Peter I ’s transfer of Alexander Nevskii’s relics to St. Petersburg.

Canadian-American Slavic StudiesVol. 59(2)
University of Wisconsin–Green Bay (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.