Voices of Dissent: A Comparative Study of Aitys(h) in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Abstract Aitys(h) remains an essential tradition in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, blending artistic expression with social critique. Aitys(h) provides a tradition-sanctioned avenue for aqyns to voice public concerns, challenge authority, and influence social discourse. However, government influence and self-censorship define its boundaries, especially in Kazakhstan, where increased state funding has altered the tradition’s dynamics. Despite these constraints, aqyns occasionally voice direct criticism and demand accountability from authorities, underscoring the subversive potential of aitys(h) . Drawing on Foucault’s concept of discursive power, this study explores how aqyns balance critique and conformity, with audience engagement reinforcing their influence. Kyrgyz aqyns engage in broader societal critique, while Kazakh performances tend to address mostly regional concerns. Ultimately, aitys(h) remains a powerful tool for shaping public discourse, preserving national identity, and navigating the intersection of tradition, politics, and resistance in Central Asia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central Asian Affairs
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30965/22142290-bja10063
Primary Topic
Philippine History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voices of Dissent: A Comparative Study of Aitys(h) in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Assem Kalkamanova, Akylai Otkulbek kyzy
Central Asian Affairs
Philippine History and Culture
article

Voices of Dissent: A Comparative Study of Aitys(h) in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Assem Kalkamanova, Akylai Otkulbek kyzy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aitys(h) remains an essential tradition in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, blending artistic expression with social critique. Aitys(h) provides a tradition-sanctioned avenue for aqyns to voice public concerns, challenge authority, and influence social discourse. However, government influence and self-censorship define its boundaries, especially in Kazakhstan, where increased state funding has altered the tradition’s dynamics. Despite these constraints, aqyns occasionally voice direct criticism and demand accountability from authorities, underscoring the subversive potential of aitys(h) . Drawing on Foucault’s concept of discursive power, this study explores how aqyns balance critique and conformity, with audience engagement reinforcing their influence. Kyrgyz aqyns engage in broader societal critique, while Kazakh performances tend to address mostly regional concerns. Ultimately, aitys(h) remains a powerful tool for shaping public discourse, preserving national identity, and navigating the intersection of tradition, politics, and resistance in Central Asia.

Central Asian AffairsVol. 12(1)
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Philippine History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Voices of Dissent: A Comparative Study of Aitys(h) in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan — Assem Kalkamanova, Akylai Otkulbek kyzy · Central Asian Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS