Nonviolent Action and Free Market Environmentalism

Abstract This paper’s unique contribution is to connect the concepts of nonviolent action and free market environmentalism ( fme ). The scholarship on nonviolent action explores diverse institutional arrangements that facilitate peace and mitigate violence. fme uses comparative institutional analysis to explore how property rights, entrepreneurship, and mutually beneficial exchange can address environmental problems. By synthesizing the literatures on nonviolent action and fme , this paper argues that many environmental problems can be addressed in voluntary, peaceful, positive-sum ways. Individuals can nonviolently address environmental issues when property rights are secure, mutually beneficial exchange can occur, entrepreneurs can innovate, and new institutions can be tried. Public policies may sometimes be required, but ill-designed policies may spark negative-sum conflict, property destruction, and violence. Three case studies demonstrate how peaceful, voluntary action can effectively address environmental issues, including large-scale land preservation at the American Prairie Reserve, the conservation of the greater sage-grouse, and climate change mitigation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/27727882-bja00046
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonviolent Action and Free Market Environmentalism

Jordan K. Lofthouse
Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Nonviolent Action and Free Market Environmentalism

Jordan K. Lofthouse
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper’s unique contribution is to connect the concepts of nonviolent action and free market environmentalism ( fme ). The scholarship on nonviolent action explores diverse institutional arrangements that facilitate peace and mitigate violence. fme uses comparative institutional analysis to explore how property rights, entrepreneurship, and mutually beneficial exchange can address environmental problems. By synthesizing the literatures on nonviolent action and fme , this paper argues that many environmental problems can be addressed in voluntary, peaceful, positive-sum ways. Individuals can nonviolently address environmental issues when property rights are secure, mutually beneficial exchange can occur, entrepreneurs can innovate, and new institutions can be tried. Public policies may sometimes be required, but ill-designed policies may spark negative-sum conflict, property destruction, and violence. Three case studies demonstrate how peaceful, voluntary action can effectively address environmental issues, including large-scale land preservation at the American Prairie Reserve, the conservation of the greater sage-grouse, and climate change mitigation.

Journal of Pacifism and NonviolenceVol. 3(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nonviolent Action and Free Market Environmentalism — Jordan K. Lofthouse · Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS