Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Anaesthesia and Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Cesarean Deliveries

Cesarean Section deliveries have seen a significant global rise over the past few decades, prompting closer examination of clinical practices that affect maternal and fetal outcomes. One such factor is the choice of anesthesia General Anesthesia (GA) versus Regional Anesthesia (RA), including spinal and epidural methods. This distinction can substantially influence immediate surgical risks, recovery time, neonatal health, and even long-term outcomes. This study employed a comparative statistical analysis based on 20 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on observational, cohort, and meta-analytical research involving elective and emergency cesarean sections. Outcomes assessed included maternal hemodynamic stability, surgical duration, glycemic stress response, recovery time, and fetal Apgar scores, NICU admissions, and neurodevelopmental markers. Data were grouped by anesthesia type and analyzed using chi-square tests, t-tests, and odds ratios, with visualizations via forest plots and bar graphs. The analysis revealed that regional anesthesia (particularly spinal anesthesia) is consistently associated with better maternal outcomes, such as improved hemodynamic stability, reduced glycemic stress, and shorter recovery times. For fetal outcomes, regional anesthesia correlated with higher Apgar scores, lower NICU admissions, and fewer neurodevelopmental concerns. General anesthesia, while occasionally necessary for specific clinical cases (e.g., emergencies, contraindications to RA), showed a statistically significant increase in both maternal and neonatal complications in the pooled data (p < 0.05). Forest plots supported the reduced odds of adverse outcomes with RA in both maternal and fetal categories.This comparative review supports the clinical preference for regional anesthesia in cesarean deliveries, where feasible. While GA remains essential in specific contexts, RA offers improved safety profiles for both mother and child in most cases. Clinical decision-making should incorporate individualized risk assessments, and further research should address long-term maternal mental health and child development post-anesthesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i4.1177
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Anaesthesia and Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Cesarean Deliveries

Eman M. Sheyab, Malak Ababneh, Rana O. Akasheh, Hana A. Alshikh et al.
Journal of Posthumanism
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Anaesthesia and Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Cesarean Deliveries

Eman M. Sheyab, Malak Ababneh, Rana O. Akasheh, Hana A. Alshikh, Ahmad A. Al-Omari, Zaid A. Shaheen, Kamlah A. AL-Olimat, Anas H. Alkhawaldah, Ahmed M. Abu-Ryash
article en

Abstract

Cesarean Section deliveries have seen a significant global rise over the past few decades, prompting closer examination of clinical practices that affect maternal and fetal outcomes. One such factor is the choice of anesthesia General Anesthesia (GA) versus Regional Anesthesia (RA), including spinal and epidural methods. This distinction can substantially influence immediate surgical risks, recovery time, neonatal health, and even long-term outcomes. This study employed a comparative statistical analysis based on 20 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on observational, cohort, and meta-analytical research involving elective and emergency cesarean sections. Outcomes assessed included maternal hemodynamic stability, surgical duration, glycemic stress response, recovery time, and fetal Apgar scores, NICU admissions, and neurodevelopmental markers. Data were grouped by anesthesia type and analyzed using chi-square tests, t-tests, and odds ratios, with visualizations via forest plots and bar graphs. The analysis revealed that regional anesthesia (particularly spinal anesthesia) is consistently associated with better maternal outcomes, such as improved hemodynamic stability, reduced glycemic stress, and shorter recovery times. For fetal outcomes, regional anesthesia correlated with higher Apgar scores, lower NICU admissions, and fewer neurodevelopmental concerns. General anesthesia, while occasionally necessary for specific clinical cases (e.g., emergencies, contraindications to RA), showed a statistically significant increase in both maternal and neonatal complications in the pooled data (p < 0.05). Forest plots supported the reduced odds of adverse outcomes with RA in both maternal and fetal categories.This comparative review supports the clinical preference for regional anesthesia in cesarean deliveries, where feasible. While GA remains essential in specific contexts, RA offers improved safety profiles for both mother and child in most cases. Clinical decision-making should incorporate individualized risk assessments, and further research should address long-term maternal mental health and child development post-anesthesia.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(4)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Jordan Hospital (JO), Isra University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.