Clinical performance validation and four diagnostic strategy assessments of high-sensitivity troponin I assays

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes conditions such as unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays have been recommended as primary biomarkers for NSTEMI diagnosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity. However, there is no consensus on the optimal diagnostic strategy for early NSTEMI detection. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of four hs-cTnI-based strategies for suspected NSTEMI: Limit of Detection (LoB), Single Cut-off, hs-cTnI 0/1 h Algorithm, and hs-cTnI 0/2 h Algorithm, in a Chinese cohort and compare the performance of assays from different manufacturers. Performance verification was conducted, including LoB, LoD, LoQ, and precision analysis. Clinical samples from 267 ACS patients were analyzed using Hybiome hs-cTnI assays. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. The LoB strategy demonstrated 100% sensitivity but low PPV (14.0%). Both the hs-cTnI 0/1 h Algorithm and hs-cTnI 0/2 h Algorithm showed high diagnostic performance, with the 0/2 h algorithm providing the best overall. 89.0% accuracy, 93.3% sensitivity, and 73.68% F1-score. The hs-cTnI 0/2 h Algorithm offers the most reliable diagnostic performance for early NSTEMI diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99273-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical performance validation and four diagnostic strategy assessments of high-sensitivity troponin I assays

Yingqi Hua, Yilin Ge, Siyu Chen, Kexin Chen et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
4.16
article

Clinical performance validation and four diagnostic strategy assessments of high-sensitivity troponin I assays

Yingqi Hua, Yilin Ge, Siyu Chen, Kexin Chen, Hui Yuan, Junyi Wu, Jeong Oh Yang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes conditions such as unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays have been recommended as primary biomarkers for NSTEMI diagnosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity. However, there is no consensus on the optimal diagnostic strategy for early NSTEMI detection. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of four hs-cTnI-based strategies for suspected NSTEMI: Limit of Detection (LoB), Single Cut-off, hs-cTnI 0/1 h Algorithm, and hs-cTnI 0/2 h Algorithm, in a Chinese cohort and compare the performance of assays from different manufacturers. Performance verification was conducted, including LoB, LoD, LoQ, and precision analysis. Clinical samples from 267 ACS patients were analyzed using Hybiome hs-cTnI assays. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. The LoB strategy demonstrated 100% sensitivity but low PPV (14.0%). Both the hs-cTnI 0/1 h Algorithm and hs-cTnI 0/2 h Algorithm showed high diagnostic performance, with the 0/2 h algorithm providing the best overall. 89.0% accuracy, 93.3% sensitivity, and 73.68% F1-score. The hs-cTnI 0/2 h Algorithm offers the most reliable diagnostic performance for early NSTEMI diagnosis.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Capital Medical University (CN), Shunyi Hospital of Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN), Beijing Anzhen Hospital (CN)
Capital Medical University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
4.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.