ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TERHADAP KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1845/K/Pid/2009)

In cases of criminal defamation. Often the indications in criminal acts of defamation cannot be produced and the verdict is regardless of their existence so that many people view this as unfair. This research was intended to analyze and obtain an overview of how defamation decisions are created and to find out how judges consider when making defamation decisions, in this case the Supreme Court Decision Number 1845 K/Pid/2009. This research applies a type of normative juridical research, using the Legislative Approach, and Case Approach using primary, secondary and tertiary legal material collection techniques. The analysis carried out is qualitative analysis. Based on the results of this research, firstly, the application of Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code is appropriate and has fulfilled all the elements in that article. The judge really studied the case and had a broad perspective by considering both juridical and non-juridical facts, so that the resulting decision could be said to have created justice. However, from the other side, the author observes that there are other elements that influence the judge's considerations, including: (1) Intention/Background of the Defendant's actions, (2) The Defendant spreads slander via SMS. So from the analysis that has been carried out, defamation is considered as a reason. The justification in this case is appropriate and correct, and is also appropriate so that it does not violate the law or positive law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23887/jih.v4i3.5032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TERHADAP KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1845/K/Pid/2009)

Muhamad Jodi Setianto, Made Sugi Hartono, I Gede Raditya Chandra Paramartha
1 citations
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis
Legal Studies and Policies
15.98
article

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TERHADAP KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1845/K/Pid/2009)

Muhamad Jodi Setianto, Made Sugi Hartono, I Gede Raditya Chandra Paramartha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In cases of criminal defamation. Often the indications in criminal acts of defamation cannot be produced and the verdict is regardless of their existence so that many people view this as unfair. This research was intended to analyze and obtain an overview of how defamation decisions are created and to find out how judges consider when making defamation decisions, in this case the Supreme Court Decision Number 1845 K/Pid/2009. This research applies a type of normative juridical research, using the Legislative Approach, and Case Approach using primary, secondary and tertiary legal material collection techniques. The analysis carried out is qualitative analysis. Based on the results of this research, firstly, the application of Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code is appropriate and has fulfilled all the elements in that article. The judge really studied the case and had a broad perspective by considering both juridical and non-juridical facts, so that the resulting decision could be said to have created justice. However, from the other side, the author observes that there are other elements that influence the judge's considerations, including: (1) Intention/Background of the Defendant's actions, (2) The Defendant spreads slander via SMS. So from the analysis that has been carried out, defamation is considered as a reason. The justification in this case is appropriate and correct, and is also appropriate so that it does not violate the law or positive law.

Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui GenerisVol. 4(3)
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal Studies and Policies
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.