Water Pipeline Leakage Recognition and Localization Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques

Water distribution systems often face problems with leaks, causing water loss and environmental worries. In literature, applications of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms in detecting a pipeline leak are tremendous, which helps to avoid wastage of water and environmental worries. For pipeline leak location, there are a few DL-based techniques, but ML techniques are not available. This work’s primary goal was to investigate various machine learning and deep learning techniques for leak identification and localization utilizing data gathered from an acousto-optic sensor to determine a more effective and precise approach. ML algorithms explored in this study are k-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), categorical boosting (CatBoost), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost). DL models explored in this study are the recurrent neural network (RNN), convolutional neural network (CNN), VGG16, and region-based convolutional neural network (RCNN). For ML algorithms, 10 traditional features were extracted from the raw one-dimensional time series data. For DL methods, the collected data underwent preprocessing. The preprocessing included data augmentation and normalization to ensure high-quality and consistent results. XGB provided the highest leak detection and localization accuracy among the ML algorithms. All the DL methods were tested at two different pressures, namely 200,000 Pa (2 bar) and 300,000 Pa (3 bar), to check the stability. Furthermore, the RCNN provided the highest leak detection and localization accuracy among the DL methods at pressures of both 2 and 3 bar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jpsea2.pseng-1815
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Pipeline Leakage Recognition and Localization Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques

Mohanaprasad Kothandaraman, Srutakirti Bhowmik, Uma Rajasekaran, J. Jean Jenifer Nesam et al.
2 citations
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Water Systems and Optimization
1.91
article

Water Pipeline Leakage Recognition and Localization Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques

Mohanaprasad Kothandaraman, Srutakirti Bhowmik, Uma Rajasekaran, J. Jean Jenifer Nesam, Ali Asgar Chandanwala, Parna Chaudhury
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Water distribution systems often face problems with leaks, causing water loss and environmental worries. In literature, applications of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms in detecting a pipeline leak are tremendous, which helps to avoid wastage of water and environmental worries. For pipeline leak location, there are a few DL-based techniques, but ML techniques are not available. This work’s primary goal was to investigate various machine learning and deep learning techniques for leak identification and localization utilizing data gathered from an acousto-optic sensor to determine a more effective and precise approach. ML algorithms explored in this study are k-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), categorical boosting (CatBoost), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost). DL models explored in this study are the recurrent neural network (RNN), convolutional neural network (CNN), VGG16, and region-based convolutional neural network (RCNN). For ML algorithms, 10 traditional features were extracted from the raw one-dimensional time series data. For DL methods, the collected data underwent preprocessing. The preprocessing included data augmentation and normalization to ensure high-quality and consistent results. XGB provided the highest leak detection and localization accuracy among the ML algorithms. All the DL methods were tested at two different pressures, namely 200,000 Pa (2 bar) and 300,000 Pa (3 bar), to check the stability. Furthermore, the RCNN provided the highest leak detection and localization accuracy among the DL methods at pressures of both 2 and 3 bar.

Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and PracticeVol. 16(3)
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Water Systems and Optimization
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Water Pipeline Leakage Recognition and Localization Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques — Mohanaprasad Kothandaraman, Srutakirti Bhowmik, et al. · Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS