ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TENTANG STATUS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA HAK WARIS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN

This research aims to find out: (1) the basic considerations of Constitutional Court Judges in deciding on children's inheritance rights for children outside of marriage. (2) the difference between the legal inheritance rights of children in marriage and the inheritance rights of illegitimate children in marriage. (3) the relevance of the Constitutional Court decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children Outside of Marriage which is used as a reference by Judges to decide cases regarding the inheritance rights of children outside of marriage. (4) legal reconstruction that can be accommodated by judges into marriage law regarding the Constitutional Court decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children Outside of Marriage. The type of research used by researchers is normative legal research, namely through a statutory and regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal material used are the 1945 Constitution, the Civil Code, Customary Law, and Constitutional Court Decisions. The research results show that (1) The legal force of the Constitutional Court's decision is binding and every child has the right to all forms of protection. (2) There are differences in the inheritance rights of legitimate children and illegitimate children in marriage. (3) The relevance of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children Out of Wedlock reflects the principle of equality before the law, which confirms that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees and protection. , and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law. (4) In the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children outside of marriage, Judges can use science and technology to determine the status of the father of a child outside of marriage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23887/jih.v4i2.5025
Primary Topic
Marriage and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TENTANG STATUS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA HAK WARIS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN

Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani, I Wayan Landrawan, Maria Widiastuti
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis
Marriage and Family Dynamics
article

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TENTANG STATUS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA HAK WARIS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN

Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani, I Wayan Landrawan, Maria Widiastuti
article en

Abstract

This research aims to find out: (1) the basic considerations of Constitutional Court Judges in deciding on children's inheritance rights for children outside of marriage. (2) the difference between the legal inheritance rights of children in marriage and the inheritance rights of illegitimate children in marriage. (3) the relevance of the Constitutional Court decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children Outside of Marriage which is used as a reference by Judges to decide cases regarding the inheritance rights of children outside of marriage. (4) legal reconstruction that can be accommodated by judges into marriage law regarding the Constitutional Court decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children Outside of Marriage. The type of research used by researchers is normative legal research, namely through a statutory and regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal material used are the 1945 Constitution, the Civil Code, Customary Law, and Constitutional Court Decisions. The research results show that (1) The legal force of the Constitutional Court's decision is binding and every child has the right to all forms of protection. (2) There are differences in the inheritance rights of legitimate children and illegitimate children in marriage. (3) The relevance of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children Out of Wedlock reflects the principle of equality before the law, which confirms that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees and protection. , and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law. (4) In the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 concerning the Status of Children outside of marriage, Judges can use science and technology to determine the status of the father of a child outside of marriage.

Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui GenerisVol. 4(2)
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Marriage and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TENTANG STATUS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA HAK WARIS ANAK DI LUAR PERKAWINAN — Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani, I Wayan Landrawan, et al. · Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS