Abstract CT051: SKYSCRAPER-01: A phase III, randomized trial of tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo (pbo) + atezo in patients (pts) with previously-untreated PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC

Abstract Background: Tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) has shown encouraging survival outcomes in pts with metastatic NSCLC, primarily in pts with PD-L1-high tumors (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥50%). SKYSCRAPER-01 (NCT04294810) is a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line tira + atezo in pts with PD-L1-high NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts (previously untreated; PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC; EGFR/ALK wildtype) were randomized 1:1 to receive tira 600 mg IV + atezo 1200 mg IV or pbo + atezo 1200 mg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the primary analysis set (PAS; TPS ≥50%; 22C3 assay). Secondary endpoints: INV-objective response rate (INV-ORR) and INV-duration of response (INV-DOR) in the PAS; OS in the secondary analysis set (SAS; tumor cell [TC] ≥50%; SP263 assay). Results: A total of 534 pts were randomized (tira + atezo, n=266; pbo + atezo, n=268). Pt characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. At the final PFS analysis (data cut-off 12 Mar 2022; median follow-up 9.9 months), median INV-PFS was 7.0 months with tira + atezo and 5.6 months with pbo + atezo (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63, 0.97; p=0.02; PAS). At the final OS analysis (data cut-off 24 Sep 2024; median follow-up 17.9 months), median OS was 23.1 months with tira + atezo and 16.9 months with pbo + atezo (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71, 1.08; p=0.22; PAS; Table). Tira + atezo demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, consistent with previous observations. Table PAS (TPS ≥50% per 22C3 assay) Tira + atezo Pbo + atezo (n=262) (n=259) Median PFS, months (95% CI)*† 7.0 (5.6, 9.8) 5.6 (4.4, 7.0) HR (95% CI); p-value 0.78 (0.63, 0.97); p=0.02 Median OS, months (95% CI)*† 23.1 (17.7, 28.8) 16.9 (14.6, 23.1) HR (95% CI); p-value 0.87 (0.71, 1.08); p=0.22 ORR, %* 45.8 35.1 Median DOR, months (95% CI)* 18.0 (13.6, 24.4) 14.6 (9.7, 18.6) SAS (TC ≥50% per SP263 assay) Tira + atezo Pbo + atezo (n=211) (n=209) Median OS, months (95% CI)* 24.6 (17.9, 32.0) 20.6 (16.6, 29.3) HR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.73, 1.18) Safety evaluable set ‡ Tira + atezo Pbo + atezo (n=267) (n=263) Any grade AEs, % 95.9 91.3 Grade 3-4 AEs, % 41.2 33.8 Grade 5 AEs, % 10.9 9.9 Treatment-related grade 5 AEs, % 1.5 0.8 AEs leading to treatment withdrawal, % 16.1 6.5 Any grade AESIs, % 70.0 50.6 * PFS analysis: data cut-off 12 Mar 2022 (PFS final analysis/first OS interim analysis); OS ORR, and DOR analysis: data cut-off 24 Sep 2024 (OS final analysis). PFS, ORR and DOR were assessed by the investigator. † Primary endpoints. ‡ All randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. AE, adverse event; atezo, atezolizumab; AESIs, adverse events of special interest; CI, confidence interval; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PAS, primary analysis set; pbo, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival; SAS, secondary analysis set; TC, tumor cell; tira, tiragolumab; TPS, tumor proportion score. Conclusion: The primary endpoints of INV-PFS and OS were not met in the SKYSCRAPER-01 study. Numerical improvements in both PFS and OS with tira + atezo versus pbo + atezo suggest potential antitumor activity of TIGIT targeting in NSCLC. Citation Format: Solange Peters, Roy Herbst, Hidehito Horinouchi, Luis Paz-Ares, Melissa Johnson, Benjamin Solomon, Mahmut Gumus, Mustafa Erman, Igor Bondarenko, Dong-Wan Kim, Enriqueta Felip, Alessandro Morabito, Maciej Bryl, Raymond Meng, Chipman Stroud, Palak Kundu, Xiaohui Wen, Namrata Patil, Meilin Huang, Byoung Chul Cho. SKYSCRAPER-01: A phase III, randomized trial of tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo (pbo) + atezo in patients (pts) with previously-untreated PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT051.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-ct051
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract CT051: SKYSCRAPER-01: A phase III, randomized trial of tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo (pbo) + atezo in patients (pts) with previously-untreated PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC

Mahmut Gumus, Roy S. Herbst, Igor Bondarenko, Benjamin Solomon et al.
17 citations
Cancer Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
17.77
article

Abstract CT051: SKYSCRAPER-01: A phase III, randomized trial of tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo (pbo) + atezo in patients (pts) with previously-untreated PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC

Mahmut Gumus, Roy S. Herbst, Igor Bondarenko, Benjamin Solomon, Dong Hoe Kim, Melissa L. Johnson, Mustafa Erman, Chipman Stroud, Byoung Chul Cho, Hidehito Horinouchi, Namrata S. Patil, Palak Kundu, Maciej Bryl, Enriqueta Felip, Xiaohui Wen, Meilin Huang, Luis Paz‐Ares, Raymond D. Meng, Alessandro Morabito, Solange Peters
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) has shown encouraging survival outcomes in pts with metastatic NSCLC, primarily in pts with PD-L1-high tumors (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥50%). SKYSCRAPER-01 (NCT04294810) is a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line tira + atezo in pts with PD-L1-high NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts (previously untreated; PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC; EGFR/ALK wildtype) were randomized 1:1 to receive tira 600 mg IV + atezo 1200 mg IV or pbo + atezo 1200 mg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the primary analysis set (PAS; TPS ≥50%; 22C3 assay). Secondary endpoints: INV-objective response rate (INV-ORR) and INV-duration of response (INV-DOR) in the PAS; OS in the secondary analysis set (SAS; tumor cell [TC] ≥50%; SP263 assay). Results: A total of 534 pts were randomized (tira + atezo, n=266; pbo + atezo, n=268). Pt characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. At the final PFS analysis (data cut-off 12 Mar 2022; median follow-up 9.9 months), median INV-PFS was 7.0 months with tira + atezo and 5.6 months with pbo + atezo (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63, 0.97; p=0.02; PAS). At the final OS analysis (data cut-off 24 Sep 2024; median follow-up 17.9 months), median OS was 23.1 months with tira + atezo and 16.9 months with pbo + atezo (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71, 1.08; p=0.22; PAS; Table). Tira + atezo demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, consistent with previous observations. Table PAS (TPS ≥50% per 22C3 assay) Tira + atezo Pbo + atezo (n=262) (n=259) Median PFS, months (95% CI)*† 7.0 (5.6, 9.8) 5.6 (4.4, 7.0) HR (95% CI); p-value 0.78 (0.63, 0.97); p=0.02 Median OS, months (95% CI)*† 23.1 (17.7, 28.8) 16.9 (14.6, 23.1) HR (95% CI); p-value 0.87 (0.71, 1.08); p=0.22 ORR, %* 45.8 35.1 Median DOR, months (95% CI)* 18.0 (13.6, 24.4) 14.6 (9.7, 18.6) SAS (TC ≥50% per SP263 assay) Tira + atezo Pbo + atezo (n=211) (n=209) Median OS, months (95% CI)* 24.6 (17.9, 32.0) 20.6 (16.6, 29.3) HR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.73, 1.18) Safety evaluable set ‡ Tira + atezo Pbo + atezo (n=267) (n=263) Any grade AEs, % 95.9 91.3 Grade 3-4 AEs, % 41.2 33.8 Grade 5 AEs, % 10.9 9.9 Treatment-related grade 5 AEs, % 1.5 0.8 AEs leading to treatment withdrawal, % 16.1 6.5 Any grade AESIs, % 70.0 50.6 * PFS analysis: data cut-off 12 Mar 2022 (PFS final analysis/first OS interim analysis); OS ORR, and DOR analysis: data cut-off 24 Sep 2024 (OS final analysis). PFS, ORR and DOR were assessed by the investigator. † Primary endpoints. ‡ All randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. AE, adverse event; atezo, atezolizumab; AESIs, adverse events of special interest; CI, confidence interval; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PAS, primary analysis set; pbo, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival; SAS, secondary analysis set; TC, tumor cell; tira, tiragolumab; TPS, tumor proportion score. Conclusion: The primary endpoints of INV-PFS and OS were not met in the SKYSCRAPER-01 study. Numerical improvements in both PFS and OS with tira + atezo versus pbo + atezo suggest potential antitumor activity of TIGIT targeting in NSCLC. Citation Format: Solange Peters, Roy Herbst, Hidehito Horinouchi, Luis Paz-Ares, Melissa Johnson, Benjamin Solomon, Mahmut Gumus, Mustafa Erman, Igor Bondarenko, Dong-Wan Kim, Enriqueta Felip, Alessandro Morabito, Maciej Bryl, Raymond Meng, Chipman Stroud, Palak Kundu, Xiaohui Wen, Namrata Patil, Meilin Huang, Byoung Chul Cho. SKYSCRAPER-01: A phase III, randomized trial of tiragolumab (tira) + atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo (pbo) + atezo in patients (pts) with previously-untreated PD-L1-high, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT051.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_2)
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Yale Cancer Center (US), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Sarah Cannon (US), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Hacettepe University Hospital (TR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR), Dnipro State Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
17.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.