Abstract LB010: C5F2-hexyl-(cuban-1-yl-methyl)-biguanide (C5F2-HCB) overcomes an immune excluded tumor microenvironment (TME) and suppresses tumor growth in the ovarian dependent ER+HER2- SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma allograft model

Abstract Introduction: Heme-binding biguanides inhibit cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated biosynthesis of the epoxy fatty acid (EpFA) (±)14,15-EET, which promotes progression of ER+HER2- breast cancer as well as regulatory T cell (Treg) proliferation. However, there are no known strategies to exploit this vulnerability. Metformin has shown promise but lacks sufficient potency and clinical utility. Through structure-based design, heme binding hexyl cubane derivatives of metformin were identified, which potently inhibited (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis. Fluorination of the hexyl moiety improved pharmacokinetics (PK) and reduced toxicity. Among the fluorinated derivatives, C5F2-HCB potently inhibited (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis (IC50=3.1 uM for C5F2-HCB vs. 5 mM for metformin). C5F2-HCB and metformin are candidate agents for TME activation from “cold” to “hot” due to their inhibition of EETs biosynthesis and EET-driven oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) which promotes tumor hypoxia. We then tested whether C5F2-HCB or metformin could inhibit immune exclusion in the immunologically “cold” ovarian dependent STAT1 KO SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma model, in part, by reducing Tregs and/or increasing CD8 or CD4 tumor infiltrating T cells (TIL). We hypothesized that biguanides, by reducing EETs, would suppress Tregs and promote effector T cells in the TME. We also hypothesized that C5F2-HCB would be more effective than metformin in modulating the TME, based on greater potency for inhibition of (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis. Both biguanides were tested at their maximum tolerated dose (C5F2-HCB; 18 mg/kg daily and metformin; 50 mg/kg every other day). Results: In the SSM2ucd allograft, all combination treatment groups with biguanides reduced tumor growth relative to the IgG control at the endpoint (day 63) : metformin + IgG (51.5±9.8% of control), C5F2-HCB + IgG (53.3±12.8%), metformin + anti-PD-1 (50.4±11.5%), and C5F2-HCB + anti-PD-1 (49.6±12.8%) [(P < 0.05) for all comparisons]. In contrast, anti-PD-1 antibody alone failed to reduce tumor growth at the endpoint. Flow cytometry analysis of the TME revealed that only C5F2-HCB + IgG treatment increased CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) compared to all other treatment groups (>2-fold; P < 0.05). Additionally, only C5F2-HCB + anti-PD-1 reduced intratumoral Tregs (>3-fold; P < 0.05). C5F2-HCB in combination with IgG or anti-PD-1 reduced intratumoral macrophages by >50% (P < 0.001) and reduced the M2/M1 macrophage ratio by 32-61% (P < 0.05) relative to other groups. No effects on CD4+ T cells were observed. Furthermore, C5F2-HCB and IgG or anti-PD-1 increased intratumoral neutrophils by 75- 120% compared to the anti-PD-1 or IgG (P < 0.05). (Multiple comparisons tested by ANOVA). Conclusion: Relative to IgG alone, C5F2-HCB and metformin inhibited growth of the SSM2ucd allograft in combination with either anti-PD1 or IgG. In contrast to metformin, only C5F2-HCB modulated the TME, including increased CD8+ TILs with IgG, reduced Tregs with anti-PD-1, and decreased M2/M1 macrophage ratio with IgG and anti-PD-1. C5F2-HCB, in contrast tometformin, was effective in modulating an immune excluded TME and may contribute to a strategy for clinical translation. Citation Format: Zhijun Guo, Jianxun Lei, Joshua McCarra, Qing Cao, Michael J. Pryzbilla, Brenda Koniar, Beverly Norris, Robert J. Schumacher, Swaathi Jayaraman, John R. Hawse, Antonino B. D'Assoro, Ilia G. Denisov, Stephen G. Sligar, Kathryn L. Schwertfeger, Michael A. Farrar, Dipak Panigrahy, Hammock D. Bruce, Elizabeth A. Ambrose, Gunda I. Georg, Goetz P. Matthew, David A. Potter. C5F2-hexyl-(cuban-1-yl-methyl)-biguanide (C5F2-HCB) overcomes an immune excluded tumor microenvironment (TME) and suppresses tumor growth in the ovarian dependent ER+HER2- SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma allograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr LB010.