MISKONSEPSI SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL NUMERASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF

AbstractThis study identifies and analyzes misconceptions about numeracy based on cognitive style. The research used a mixed approach with descriptive analysis involving 34 students in one of the public high schools in Kuningan. Data were collected using the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), numeracy questions, and interviews. There were 55.88% reflective cognitive style students, 23.54% impulsive, 11.76% slow-inaccurate, and 8.82% fast-accurate. Reflective students have a misconception rate of 22.10%, with the highest error in symbolic operations. Impulsive students showed a misconception rate of 34.17%, with the highest error in symbolic operations. Reflective students experience process skill errors, while impulsive students often experience transformation errors. These results indicate that students with impulsive cognitive styles rush to solve problems. Students who have a reflective cognitive style, when viewed based on the nature of their cognitive style, on average, show in the classroom that students tend to be slow in solving problems or problems. However, the answers given are more accurate and precise. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis miskonsepsi pada numerasi berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan campuran dengan analisis deskriptif yang melibatkan 34 siswa di salah satu SMA Negeri di Kuningan. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan tes Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), soal numerasi, dan wawancara. Terdapat 55,88% siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif, 23,54% impulsif, 11,76% lambat-tidak akurat, dan 8,82% cepat-akurat. Siswa reflektif memiliki tingkat miskonsepsi sebesar 22,10%, dengan kesalahan tertinggi pada operasi simbolik. Siswa impulsif menunjukkan tingkat miskonsepsi sebesar 34,17%, dengan kesalahan tertinggi juga pada operasi simbolik. Siswa reflektif cenderung mengalami kesalahan keterampilan proses, sementara siswa impulsif sering mengalami kesalahan transformasi. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa kecenderungan siswa dengan gaya kognitif impulsif cenderung terburu-buru dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Sedangkan siswa yang memiliki gaya kognitif reflektif, jika dilihat berdasarkan sifat gaya kognitifnya rata-rata menunjukkan di dalam kelas siswa cenderung lambat dalam menyelesaikan soal atau permasalahan tetapi jawaban yang diberikan lebih akurat dan tepat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ALGORITMA Journal of Mathematics Education
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v6i2.42778
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MISKONSEPSI SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL NUMERASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF

Arif Muchyidin, Yandi Heryandi, Siti Aah Safaatul Udma
ALGORITMA Journal of Mathematics Education
Computational Physics and Python Applications
article

MISKONSEPSI SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL NUMERASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF

Arif Muchyidin, Yandi Heryandi, Siti Aah Safaatul Udma
article en

Abstract

AbstractThis study identifies and analyzes misconceptions about numeracy based on cognitive style. The research used a mixed approach with descriptive analysis involving 34 students in one of the public high schools in Kuningan. Data were collected using the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), numeracy questions, and interviews. There were 55.88% reflective cognitive style students, 23.54% impulsive, 11.76% slow-inaccurate, and 8.82% fast-accurate. Reflective students have a misconception rate of 22.10%, with the highest error in symbolic operations. Impulsive students showed a misconception rate of 34.17%, with the highest error in symbolic operations. Reflective students experience process skill errors, while impulsive students often experience transformation errors. These results indicate that students with impulsive cognitive styles rush to solve problems. Students who have a reflective cognitive style, when viewed based on the nature of their cognitive style, on average, show in the classroom that students tend to be slow in solving problems or problems. However, the answers given are more accurate and precise. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis miskonsepsi pada numerasi berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan campuran dengan analisis deskriptif yang melibatkan 34 siswa di salah satu SMA Negeri di Kuningan. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan tes Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), soal numerasi, dan wawancara. Terdapat 55,88% siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif, 23,54% impulsif, 11,76% lambat-tidak akurat, dan 8,82% cepat-akurat. Siswa reflektif memiliki tingkat miskonsepsi sebesar 22,10%, dengan kesalahan tertinggi pada operasi simbolik. Siswa impulsif menunjukkan tingkat miskonsepsi sebesar 34,17%, dengan kesalahan tertinggi juga pada operasi simbolik. Siswa reflektif cenderung mengalami kesalahan keterampilan proses, sementara siswa impulsif sering mengalami kesalahan transformasi. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa kecenderungan siswa dengan gaya kognitif impulsif cenderung terburu-buru dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Sedangkan siswa yang memiliki gaya kognitif reflektif, jika dilihat berdasarkan sifat gaya kognitifnya rata-rata menunjukkan di dalam kelas siswa cenderung lambat dalam menyelesaikan soal atau permasalahan tetapi jawaban yang diberikan lebih akurat dan tepat.

ALGORITMA Journal of Mathematics EducationVol. 6(2)
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Cirebon (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.