The African entrepreneurial ecosystem index: conceptual, methodological and empirical flaws and the way forward

Abstract This paper identifies conceptual, methodological, and empirical flaws in the first African Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Index (AEEI). These flaws limit the usefulness of the AEEI. Moreover, given that the both the notions of entrepreneurial ecosystems and composite indices are subject to subjectivity and are ad hoc, use of the AEEI can lead to simplistic policy conclusions; worse, a poorly constructed index can detract, mislead and be manipulated. It is concluded that if scholars are to embark on entrepreneurial ecosystem index building despite the concept lacking sound theoretical and empirical foundations, then it is best not to focus on the cross-country level, but to start at the sub-national level and follow best practice in composite index building. This will have the benefits of at least being more consistent with the ideas of entrepreneurship as being place dependent and that ecosystem measures should be concerned with what entrepreneurs want, and less on existing institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10208-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The African entrepreneurial ecosystem index: conceptual, methodological and empirical flaws and the way forward

Wim Naudé
3 citations
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Economic Growth and Development
9.74
article

The African entrepreneurial ecosystem index: conceptual, methodological and empirical flaws and the way forward

Wim Naudé
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper identifies conceptual, methodological, and empirical flaws in the first African Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Index (AEEI). These flaws limit the usefulness of the AEEI. Moreover, given that the both the notions of entrepreneurial ecosystems and composite indices are subject to subjectivity and are ad hoc, use of the AEEI can lead to simplistic policy conclusions; worse, a poorly constructed index can detract, mislead and be manipulated. It is concluded that if scholars are to embark on entrepreneurial ecosystem index building despite the concept lacking sound theoretical and empirical foundations, then it is best not to focus on the cross-country level, but to start at the sub-national level and follow best practice in composite index building. This will have the benefits of at least being more consistent with the ideas of entrepreneurship as being place dependent and that ecosystem measures should be concerned with what entrepreneurs want, and less on existing institutions.

The Journal of Technology TransferVol. 51(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
University of Johannesburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic Growth and Development
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.