Unheard Voices: Understanding Male Victims of Campus Sexual Harassment in a Gender-Inclusive Study

This study investigates the characteristics of male victims of campus sexual harassment, revealing that there is little difference in the proportion of male and female victims. Both genders are subjected to sexual harassment by students, faculty members, and off-campus personnel, with the largest difference in frequency being 13.79% and the smallest 0.06%. Most forms of harassment show less than a 5.00% difference between male and female students. <i>T</i>-test results indicate that, except for harassment by faculty members, there is no significant difference in the frequency of harassment between genders (<i>p</i> > .05). Furthermore, male victims are more likely to be familiar with the perpetrators than female victims. Campus sexual harassment negatively impacts both genders, with male victims reporting higher negative effects in academic, social, and self-evaluation aspects. Male victims are less likely to take proactive measures or seek assistance when facing harassment. Regression model and Shapley value decomposition analyses reveal that gender significantly influences the frequency of harassment, particularly when the perpetrator is the faculty member. Overall, this study highlights the need for increased attention to male victims of campus sexual harassment and the importance of addressing gender differences in coping strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2025.2477471
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unheard Voices: Understanding Male Victims of Campus Sexual Harassment in a Gender-Inclusive Study

Li Zheng, Ran Zhang
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Unheard Voices: Understanding Male Victims of Campus Sexual Harassment in a Gender-Inclusive Study

Li Zheng, Ran Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the characteristics of male victims of campus sexual harassment, revealing that there is little difference in the proportion of male and female victims. Both genders are subjected to sexual harassment by students, faculty members, and off-campus personnel, with the largest difference in frequency being 13.79% and the smallest 0.06%. Most forms of harassment show less than a 5.00% difference between male and female students. <i>T</i>-test results indicate that, except for harassment by faculty members, there is no significant difference in the frequency of harassment between genders (<i>p</i> > .05). Furthermore, male victims are more likely to be familiar with the perpetrators than female victims. Campus sexual harassment negatively impacts both genders, with male victims reporting higher negative effects in academic, social, and self-evaluation aspects. Male victims are less likely to take proactive measures or seek assistance when facing harassment. Regression model and Shapley value decomposition analyses reveal that gender significantly influences the frequency of harassment, particularly when the perpetrator is the faculty member. Overall, this study highlights the need for increased attention to male victims of campus sexual harassment and the importance of addressing gender differences in coping strategies.

Journal of Sex & Marital TherapyVol. 51(4)
Peking University (CN), Shanghai Normal University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.