The Ethics of Heart Donation After the Circulatory Determination of Death: Gaps in Knowledge and Research Opportunities

In 2023, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) organized a workshop to identify research gap areas in organ donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD). We present the findings of the DCDD ethics working group. Heart DCDD, as all DCDD, may disrupt optimal end-of-life care. Irrespective of organ donation, research opportunities include identifying which processes of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy offer optimum patient comfort, how best to ensure patient comfort at the end of life, and how to better understand patients' preferences for end-of-life care. Whether heart DCDD breaches the Dead Donor Rule (DDR) depends on its interpretation, the validity and rationale of the determination of death, and the DCDD protocol used. Further research could clarify the interpretation of the DDR, the concept and determination of death, the time the cessation of brain function ensures that the patient is beyond neuro-cognitive harm, the implications of thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion on the determination of death and on brain functions, and the type of consent and level of information required for different DCDD techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13421
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of Heart Donation After the Circulatory Determination of Death: Gaps in Knowledge and Research Opportunities

Kathleen N. Fenton, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Anne L. Dalle Ave, David Rodríguez‐Arias et al.
2 citations
Bioethics
Organ Donation and Transplantation
3.76
article

The Ethics of Heart Donation After the Circulatory Determination of Death: Gaps in Knowledge and Research Opportunities

Kathleen N. Fenton, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Anne L. Dalle Ave, David Rodríguez‐Arias, James L. Bernat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In 2023, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) organized a workshop to identify research gap areas in organ donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD). We present the findings of the DCDD ethics working group. Heart DCDD, as all DCDD, may disrupt optimal end-of-life care. Irrespective of organ donation, research opportunities include identifying which processes of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy offer optimum patient comfort, how best to ensure patient comfort at the end of life, and how to better understand patients' preferences for end-of-life care. Whether heart DCDD breaches the Dead Donor Rule (DDR) depends on its interpretation, the validity and rationale of the determination of death, and the DCDD protocol used. Further research could clarify the interpretation of the DDR, the concept and determination of death, the time the cessation of brain function ensures that the patient is beyond neuro-cognitive harm, the implications of thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion on the determination of death and on brain functions, and the type of consent and level of information required for different DCDD techniques.

BioethicsVol. 39(7)
Dartmouth College (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Universidad de Granada (ES), Georgetown University (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.