The Impact of Rainfall‐Induced Income Shocks on Crime: Evidence From Indonesia

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the causal impact of rainfall shocks on crime rates in Indonesia by utilising two novel crime data sources: newspaper reports and crime victimisation data from a household survey. By leveraging the income data from the household survey, this study directly tests the economic channel through which rainfall affects crime. The findings reveal mixed results depending on the data source. Newspaper reports indicate no relationship between rainfall shocks and crime incidents. In contrast, analysis using the crime victimisation data demonstrates that positive rainfall shocks reduce the probability of becoming a victim of any crime by 12% compared with negative rainfall shocks. This reduction is driven entirely by property crimes, with no impact observed on other types of crime. These results highlight the nontrivial role of economic conditions in influencing property‐related crime. I explore various reasons that may contribute to the different results between the two data sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Development
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.4000
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Rainfall‐Induced Income Shocks on Crime: Evidence From Indonesia

Allen Hardiman
1 citations
Journal of International Development
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
article

The Impact of Rainfall‐Induced Income Shocks on Crime: Evidence From Indonesia

Allen Hardiman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the causal impact of rainfall shocks on crime rates in Indonesia by utilising two novel crime data sources: newspaper reports and crime victimisation data from a household survey. By leveraging the income data from the household survey, this study directly tests the economic channel through which rainfall affects crime. The findings reveal mixed results depending on the data source. Newspaper reports indicate no relationship between rainfall shocks and crime incidents. In contrast, analysis using the crime victimisation data demonstrates that positive rainfall shocks reduce the probability of becoming a victim of any crime by 12% compared with negative rainfall shocks. This reduction is driven entirely by property crimes, with no impact observed on other types of crime. These results highlight the nontrivial role of economic conditions in influencing property‐related crime. I explore various reasons that may contribute to the different results between the two data sources.

Journal of International DevelopmentVol. 37(5)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), American Medical Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.