Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts

The region, botanical origin, and bee species influence the raw propolis content and its bioactive properties. Additionally, the extraction methods, solvents, and various process parameters significantly affect the bioactive properties of propolis extract, which is consumed as a food supplement or pharmaceutical product. In this study, propolis with a chestnut botanical origin, obtained from the Black Sea region in Turkey, was used as the raw material. The process parameters of three basic extraction methods— maceration (M), reflux (R), and ultrasound-assisted (UA)—were optimised using response surface methodology. Antioxidant activity (AA) and total phenolic content (TPC) were used as response parameters. The optimised levels for M were 78.46% ethanol concentration and 71.05 hours for extraction time; for R, 80.64% ethanol concentration, 117.44 minutes for extraction time, and 38.38°C for temperature; and for UA, 82.49% ethanol concentration, 59.12 minutes for extraction time, and 40.53°C for temperature. The results were statistically validated using the t-test. The AA, TPC, and phenolic, volatile, and mineral contents were compared among the optimised chestnut propolis extracts. Chrysin, a flavone, and pinocembrin, a flavanone, along with ferulic and ellagic acid, among the phenolic acids, were identified as the most abundant phenolic compounds. Among the 11 elements, the highest macro elements were Na, K, and Ca, while the trace elements were Fe and Zn. The phenolic, volatile, and mineral compositions of the optimised propolis extracts exhibited heterogeneous distributions. However, fatty acids (e.g., 18:0, 18:1) were present at relatively high levels only in R; phenolic compounds were obtained in relatively high amounts via M extraction. Some minor volatiles were detected only by UA extraction. Following the characterisation of the optimised extracts, it was determined that each extraction method has its own unique advantages. The results indicate that all three methods should be optimised and used together to achieve the highest component composition and bioactivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1540221
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts

Müge Hendek Ertop, Sevde Nur Şenol Yazkan
1 citations
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
1.67
article

Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts

Müge Hendek Ertop, Sevde Nur Şenol Yazkan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The region, botanical origin, and bee species influence the raw propolis content and its bioactive properties. Additionally, the extraction methods, solvents, and various process parameters significantly affect the bioactive properties of propolis extract, which is consumed as a food supplement or pharmaceutical product. In this study, propolis with a chestnut botanical origin, obtained from the Black Sea region in Turkey, was used as the raw material. The process parameters of three basic extraction methods— maceration (M), reflux (R), and ultrasound-assisted (UA)—were optimised using response surface methodology. Antioxidant activity (AA) and total phenolic content (TPC) were used as response parameters. The optimised levels for M were 78.46% ethanol concentration and 71.05 hours for extraction time; for R, 80.64% ethanol concentration, 117.44 minutes for extraction time, and 38.38°C for temperature; and for UA, 82.49% ethanol concentration, 59.12 minutes for extraction time, and 40.53°C for temperature. The results were statistically validated using the t-test. The AA, TPC, and phenolic, volatile, and mineral contents were compared among the optimised chestnut propolis extracts. Chrysin, a flavone, and pinocembrin, a flavanone, along with ferulic and ellagic acid, among the phenolic acids, were identified as the most abundant phenolic compounds. Among the 11 elements, the highest macro elements were Na, K, and Ca, while the trace elements were Fe and Zn. The phenolic, volatile, and mineral compositions of the optimised propolis extracts exhibited heterogeneous distributions. However, fatty acids (e.g., 18:0, 18:1) were present at relatively high levels only in R; phenolic compounds were obtained in relatively high amounts via M extraction. Some minor volatiles were detected only by UA extraction. Following the characterisation of the optimised extracts, it was determined that each extraction method has its own unique advantages. The results indicate that all three methods should be optimised and used together to achieve the highest component composition and bioactivity.

Tarım Bilimleri DergisiVol. 31(2)
Kastamonu University (TR)
Kastamonu Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.