Caries in a cohort of adults with cystic fibrosis: a cross-sectional study

Objectives To measure past dental caries experience in people with cystic fibrosis and to compare the results with a control group of people without cystic fibrosis.Methods A cross-sectional study of 92 adults with cystic fibrosis and 92 adults without cystic fibrosis was undertaken in Cork University Dental School and Hospital. The median age for study group and control group participants was 31 years and 27 years, respectively. All participants completed a detailed questionnaire before undergoing a clinical examination that recorded demographic, social and oral health variables. Caries was recorded using the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index. All data were statistically analysed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-squared test and Fisher's test. Negative binomial models were also used to analyse data.Results The study group had a higher mean DMFT score compared to the control group (6.52, 0.99, 0.41, 3.89 versus 5.33, 0.18, 0.11, 3.68). While the study group had a higher DMFT, the only component that was statistically significant between the groups was the Decayed Teeth component (p <0.001).Conclusion In this study, the cohort of people with cystic fibrosis had more caries than people without cystic fibrosis. Further research is required to establish if underlying systemic conditions, social and behavioural factors, or a combination of the aforementioned are responsible for a higher caries experience in this study group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BDJ
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-8269-8
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caries in a cohort of adults with cystic fibrosis: a cross-sectional study

Anthony Roberts, Barry J. Plant, Niamh Coffey, Martina Hayes et al.
1 links
BDJ
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Caries in a cohort of adults with cystic fibrosis: a cross-sectional study

Anthony Roberts, Barry J. Plant, Niamh Coffey, Martina Hayes, Francis Burke, Peter F. Regan, L. Kirwan, Fiona O’ Leary
article en

Abstract

Objectives To measure past dental caries experience in people with cystic fibrosis and to compare the results with a control group of people without cystic fibrosis.Methods A cross-sectional study of 92 adults with cystic fibrosis and 92 adults without cystic fibrosis was undertaken in Cork University Dental School and Hospital. The median age for study group and control group participants was 31 years and 27 years, respectively. All participants completed a detailed questionnaire before undergoing a clinical examination that recorded demographic, social and oral health variables. Caries was recorded using the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index. All data were statistically analysed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-squared test and Fisher's test. Negative binomial models were also used to analyse data.Results The study group had a higher mean DMFT score compared to the control group (6.52, 0.99, 0.41, 3.89 versus 5.33, 0.18, 0.11, 3.68). While the study group had a higher DMFT, the only component that was statistically significant between the groups was the Decayed Teeth component (p <0.001).Conclusion In this study, the cohort of people with cystic fibrosis had more caries than people without cystic fibrosis. Further research is required to establish if underlying systemic conditions, social and behavioural factors, or a combination of the aforementioned are responsible for a higher caries experience in this study group.

BDJVol. 238(8)
Cork University Hospital (IE), Dublin Dental University Hospital (IE), Cystic Fibrosis Ireland (IE)
Health Research Board, University College Cork
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.