We Will Succeed: How Varying Success Expectancies and Socially Shared Regulation Shape Students' Collaborative Learning

ABSTRACT Background Collaborative learning offers benefits, but its potential is often undermined by motivational challenges. This study uses the situated expectancy‐value theory to explore how students' expectancies for success relate to group‐level regulation of learning during collaborative interactions. The study considers success expectancies both as a motivational condition for and a product of group‐level regulation during collaborative learning. Success expectancies are examined both as a condition for and a product of regulated learning, influencing students' engagement in motivation regulation and being shaped by it in turn. Objectives This study aims to understand the interconnection between group‐level regulation and students' success expectancies during collaborative learning and how this sets the stage for learning outcomes. Methods Forty‐eight eighth graders engaged in a four‐phase collaborative science task in small groups. Video recordings captured the groups' regulation, and each member completed situational self‐reports during different task phases. Stimulated recall interviews conducted after the task explored students' subjective justifications for variations in their situational expectancies for success. Employing multi‐channel sequence mining and clustering with mixture hidden Markov models, the study identified two types of group‐level regulation sequences: engaged in group‐level regulation and occasional cognitive group‐level regulation. Results and Conclusions Findings revealed characteristics of group‐level regulation sequences and showed that frequent engagement in cognitive and motivation regulation is associated with more positive success expectancies during and after the task. Success expectancies emerged as both a motivational condition and product of SSRL , correlating with task performance. Qualitative interview findings provided further insights into students' expectancies, shedding light on the motivational dynamics of collaborative learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70024
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Will Succeed: How Varying Success Expectancies and Socially Shared Regulation Shape Students' Collaborative Learning

Hanna Järvenoja, Tiina Törmänen, M Turunen, Emma Lehtoaho
5 citations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
17.22
article

We Will Succeed: How Varying Success Expectancies and Socially Shared Regulation Shape Students' Collaborative Learning

Hanna Järvenoja, Tiina Törmänen, M Turunen, Emma Lehtoaho
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Collaborative learning offers benefits, but its potential is often undermined by motivational challenges. This study uses the situated expectancy‐value theory to explore how students' expectancies for success relate to group‐level regulation of learning during collaborative interactions. The study considers success expectancies both as a motivational condition for and a product of group‐level regulation during collaborative learning. Success expectancies are examined both as a condition for and a product of regulated learning, influencing students' engagement in motivation regulation and being shaped by it in turn. Objectives This study aims to understand the interconnection between group‐level regulation and students' success expectancies during collaborative learning and how this sets the stage for learning outcomes. Methods Forty‐eight eighth graders engaged in a four‐phase collaborative science task in small groups. Video recordings captured the groups' regulation, and each member completed situational self‐reports during different task phases. Stimulated recall interviews conducted after the task explored students' subjective justifications for variations in their situational expectancies for success. Employing multi‐channel sequence mining and clustering with mixture hidden Markov models, the study identified two types of group‐level regulation sequences: engaged in group‐level regulation and occasional cognitive group‐level regulation. Results and Conclusions Findings revealed characteristics of group‐level regulation sequences and showed that frequent engagement in cognitive and motivation regulation is associated with more positive success expectancies during and after the task. Success expectancies emerged as both a motivational condition and product of SSRL , correlating with task performance. Qualitative interview findings provided further insights into students' expectancies, shedding light on the motivational dynamics of collaborative learning.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 41(3)
University of Oulu (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
17.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.