Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility through the lens of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method using a stacking ensemble model

This study develops a novel explainable stacking ensemble model that combines the stacked generalization ensemble method with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance the prediction and interpretation of gully erosion susceptibility. Applied to Jefferson County, Illinois, our approach leverages Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) as both base and meta-learners in various configurations, resulting in 44 distinct stacking models. The comparative analysis demonstrated the superior predictive performance of the stacked models when evaluated at 200 randomly gully sites selected points based on LiDAR difference observations; all but three exceeded the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.86 achieved by the best-performing base model (GBM). The LR stacking model, combining RF and GBM as base models with LR as the meta-learner, emerged as the most effective, achieving an AUC of 0.916. The resulting gully erosion susceptibility map by the LR stacking model classified 33 % of the agricultural land (89,208 ha) as the "very high" class, compared to 27 %, 87 %, 27 %, and 55 % predicted by individual RF, LR, GBM, and DNN models, respectively. Crucially, SHAP analysis elucidated how changes in feature values influence model behavior, considering feature interactions within both the base models and the meta-learner. The SHAP identified the annual leaf area index (LAI) as the most influential feature in both RF and GBM base models. Additionally, it highlights the significance of the GBM model in comparison to the RF base model in the final decision-making process of the stacking model. By offering a transparent mechanism to evaluate how different features and models contribute to final decisions, this approach can be extended to broader environmental management and policy-making contexts, facilitating more informed and responsible resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125478
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility through the lens of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method using a stacking ensemble model

Maria L. Chu, Jeongho Han, Jorge A. Gúzman
7 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Soil erosion and sediment transport
8.30
article

Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility through the lens of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method using a stacking ensemble model

Maria L. Chu, Jeongho Han, Jorge A. Gúzman
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study develops a novel explainable stacking ensemble model that combines the stacked generalization ensemble method with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance the prediction and interpretation of gully erosion susceptibility. Applied to Jefferson County, Illinois, our approach leverages Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) as both base and meta-learners in various configurations, resulting in 44 distinct stacking models. The comparative analysis demonstrated the superior predictive performance of the stacked models when evaluated at 200 randomly gully sites selected points based on LiDAR difference observations; all but three exceeded the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.86 achieved by the best-performing base model (GBM). The LR stacking model, combining RF and GBM as base models with LR as the meta-learner, emerged as the most effective, achieving an AUC of 0.916. The resulting gully erosion susceptibility map by the LR stacking model classified 33 % of the agricultural land (89,208 ha) as the "very high" class, compared to 27 %, 87 %, 27 %, and 55 % predicted by individual RF, LR, GBM, and DNN models, respectively. Crucially, SHAP analysis elucidated how changes in feature values influence model behavior, considering feature interactions within both the base models and the meta-learner. The SHAP identified the annual leaf area index (LAI) as the most influential feature in both RF and GBM base models. Additionally, it highlights the significance of the GBM model in comparison to the RF base model in the final decision-making process of the stacking model. By offering a transparent mechanism to evaluate how different features and models contribute to final decisions, this approach can be extended to broader environmental management and policy-making contexts, facilitating more informed and responsible resource allocation.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 383
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Kangwon National University (KR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
8.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.