Sigmund Freud's Reading of Leonardo da Vinci: Between Criticism, Praise, and Fallacy

This study aims to analyze Sigmund Freud's perspective on Leonardo da Vinci's artistic creativity.Freud employed psychoanalysis to interpret the psychological factors that influenced da Vinci's personality and works.He based his analysis on the idea that creativity serves as a means of releasing repressed emotions and argued that the absence of a father in da Vinci's childhood had a profound impact on his intellectual and artistic orientations.Freud also provided psychological interpretations of some of da Vinci's works, such as the Mona Lisa, viewing it as a representation of the lost mother figure.However, these interpretations faced widespread criticism, as some scholars considered them to be based on assumptions lacking sufficient historical evidence.The study concludes that da Vinci's genius was not merely a product of his psychological conflicts but rather the result of his passion for knowledge and scientific experimentation, making the interpretation of his creativity more complex than just psychoanalysis.Thus, the research opens a discussion on the limitations of psychoanalysis in understanding the creative process of great artists.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ANCIENT LAND
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36719/2706-6185/45/135-141
Primary Topic
Science Education and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sigmund Freud's Reading of Leonardo da Vinci: Between Criticism, Praise, and Fallacy

Riad Khouder
ANCIENT LAND
Science Education and Perceptions
article

Sigmund Freud's Reading of Leonardo da Vinci: Between Criticism, Praise, and Fallacy

Riad Khouder
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Sigmund Freud's perspective on Leonardo da Vinci's artistic creativity.Freud employed psychoanalysis to interpret the psychological factors that influenced da Vinci's personality and works.He based his analysis on the idea that creativity serves as a means of releasing repressed emotions and argued that the absence of a father in da Vinci's childhood had a profound impact on his intellectual and artistic orientations.Freud also provided psychological interpretations of some of da Vinci's works, such as the Mona Lisa, viewing it as a representation of the lost mother figure.However, these interpretations faced widespread criticism, as some scholars considered them to be based on assumptions lacking sufficient historical evidence.The study concludes that da Vinci's genius was not merely a product of his psychological conflicts but rather the result of his passion for knowledge and scientific experimentation, making the interpretation of his creativity more complex than just psychoanalysis.Thus, the research opens a discussion on the limitations of psychoanalysis in understanding the creative process of great artists.

ANCIENT LANDVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Science Education and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sigmund Freud's Reading of Leonardo da Vinci: Between Criticism, Praise, and Fallacy — Riad Khouder · ANCIENT LAND (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS