Development and application of tail brush elastic test device

The shield tail brush loss elasticity is the key reason for the failure of shield tail seal. However, due to the limitation of test equipment, there is little research on the elastic properties of tail brush. In this research, a tail brush elastic test device was developed. Through this device, the tail brush is tested for elasticity. In this test, the grease filling layer number, tail brush mass, tail clearance, pressing number and pressing time were taken as the influencing factors, and the elastic coefficient and resilience force were taken as the response values. Single-factor test was carried out for each factor, then based on the Plackett-Burmanf theory and Box-Behnken response surface design theory, the ANOVA method was used to find out the significant degree of each factor's influence on the quantitative index. The prediction model of elastic coefficient and resilience force was fitted based on RSM theory, and the verification group was added to verify the reliability of the prediction model. The results showed that the significance of influencing factors on the elasticity coefficient was ranked as follows: tail clearance > pressing number > pressing time > grease filling layer number. The significance of influencing factors on brush resilience F was ranked as follows: tailclearance > grease filling layer number > pressing time > pressing number. The accuracy of elastic coefficient regression model is 94.1%. The accuracy of the resilience force regression model is 99.56%, and the accuracy of the prediction model is high, which can be used to predict the elasticity coefficient and resilience force. Finally, the elastoplastic development mechanism of tail brush is discussed, and the safety standard of tail brush is proposed, which provides a basis for the selection of tail brush in practical construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99089-3
Primary Topic
Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and application of tail brush elastic test device

Z. Ren, Shaopu Yang, Jingbo Guo, Mingming Han et al.
Scientific Reports
Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
article

Development and application of tail brush elastic test device

Z. Ren, Shaopu Yang, Jingbo Guo, Mingming Han, Jingkai Li, Ziyue Zhang, Jinbo Liu, Jie Li, Jun Ge
article en

Abstract

The shield tail brush loss elasticity is the key reason for the failure of shield tail seal. However, due to the limitation of test equipment, there is little research on the elastic properties of tail brush. In this research, a tail brush elastic test device was developed. Through this device, the tail brush is tested for elasticity. In this test, the grease filling layer number, tail brush mass, tail clearance, pressing number and pressing time were taken as the influencing factors, and the elastic coefficient and resilience force were taken as the response values. Single-factor test was carried out for each factor, then based on the Plackett-Burmanf theory and Box-Behnken response surface design theory, the ANOVA method was used to find out the significant degree of each factor's influence on the quantitative index. The prediction model of elastic coefficient and resilience force was fitted based on RSM theory, and the verification group was added to verify the reliability of the prediction model. The results showed that the significance of influencing factors on the elasticity coefficient was ranked as follows: tail clearance > pressing number > pressing time > grease filling layer number. The significance of influencing factors on brush resilience F was ranked as follows: tailclearance > grease filling layer number > pressing time > pressing number. The accuracy of elastic coefficient regression model is 94.1%. The accuracy of the resilience force regression model is 99.56%, and the accuracy of the prediction model is high, which can be used to predict the elasticity coefficient and resilience force. Finally, the elastoplastic development mechanism of tail brush is discussed, and the safety standard of tail brush is proposed, which provides a basis for the selection of tail brush in practical construction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
State Administration of Work Safety (CN), Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.