The Effects of a Pre-Extubation Single Recruitment Maneuver on Ultrasonographic Lung Conditions in Patients Undergoing Lateral Decubitus Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

<b>Background</b>: Upper abdominal surgeries exceeding two hours and operated in a lateral decubitus position present an "intermediate" risk for pulmonary complications. The objectives of this study were to observe the sonographic and clinical changes during and after surgeries with one recruitment maneuver (RM) performed intraoperatively before extubation. <b>Methods</b>: Laparoscopic nephrectomy patients were randomized into pre-extubation single RM (Group RM) and control (Group NoRM) groups. The LUS (Lung Ultrasound Score) was evaluated after intubation (T1), at the end of surgery before the RM (T2), after the RM but before extubation (T3), and 30 min after arrival to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (T4) in Group RM; in Group NoRM, it was evaluated at the T1, T2, and T4 time points. The primary outcome was the effect on the pre-extubation LUS (T2 in Group NoRM versus T3 in Group RM). The secondary outcomes included the effects on the T4 LUS, PPC occurrence, and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios, and the sensitivity and specificity of the LUS in predicting PPCs. <b>Results</b>: The data of 54 patients were analyzed. The pre-extubation LUS was significantly lower in Group RM (16 (12.5, 17) vs. 18 (17, 20), <i>p</i> < 0.001). The T4 LUS was only different in the upper zones in the dependent lung (2 (1, 3.5) in Group RM vs. 4 (3, 4.5) in Group NoRM, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The perioperative PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The pre-extubation LUS exhibited 91% sensitivity (<i>p</i> = 0.04), whereas the T4 LUS sensitivity was 82% (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The PPC risk was 10-fold higher in patients with a pre-extubation LUS exceeding 19. <b>Conclusions</b>: A pre-extubation single RM instantly increases the LUS. However, this does not persist postoperatively or diminish respiratory complications. More importantly, the LUS was found to be a sensitive tool for predicting PPCs when performed just before extubation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14092969
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of a Pre-Extubation Single Recruitment Maneuver on Ultrasonographic Lung Conditions in Patients Undergoing Lateral Decubitus Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Emre Sertaç Bingül, Selçuk Erdem, Cansu Uzuntürk, Mert Canbaz et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.55
article

The Effects of a Pre-Extubation Single Recruitment Maneuver on Ultrasonographic Lung Conditions in Patients Undergoing Lateral Decubitus Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Emre Sertaç Bingül, Selçuk Erdem, Cansu Uzuntürk, Mert Canbaz, Meltem Savran Karadeniz, Mert N. Senturk, Emre Şentürk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Upper abdominal surgeries exceeding two hours and operated in a lateral decubitus position present an "intermediate" risk for pulmonary complications. The objectives of this study were to observe the sonographic and clinical changes during and after surgeries with one recruitment maneuver (RM) performed intraoperatively before extubation. <b>Methods</b>: Laparoscopic nephrectomy patients were randomized into pre-extubation single RM (Group RM) and control (Group NoRM) groups. The LUS (Lung Ultrasound Score) was evaluated after intubation (T1), at the end of surgery before the RM (T2), after the RM but before extubation (T3), and 30 min after arrival to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (T4) in Group RM; in Group NoRM, it was evaluated at the T1, T2, and T4 time points. The primary outcome was the effect on the pre-extubation LUS (T2 in Group NoRM versus T3 in Group RM). The secondary outcomes included the effects on the T4 LUS, PPC occurrence, and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios, and the sensitivity and specificity of the LUS in predicting PPCs. <b>Results</b>: The data of 54 patients were analyzed. The pre-extubation LUS was significantly lower in Group RM (16 (12.5, 17) vs. 18 (17, 20), <i>p</i> < 0.001). The T4 LUS was only different in the upper zones in the dependent lung (2 (1, 3.5) in Group RM vs. 4 (3, 4.5) in Group NoRM, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The perioperative PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The pre-extubation LUS exhibited 91% sensitivity (<i>p</i> = 0.04), whereas the T4 LUS sensitivity was 82% (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The PPC risk was 10-fold higher in patients with a pre-extubation LUS exceeding 19. <b>Conclusions</b>: A pre-extubation single RM instantly increases the LUS. However, this does not persist postoperatively or diminish respiratory complications. More importantly, the LUS was found to be a sensitive tool for predicting PPCs when performed just before extubation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Acıbadem University (TR), Acıbadem Adana Hospital (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.